The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fixing Market Failures or Fixing Elections? Agricultural Credit in India
Open accessAbstract
This paper integrates theories of political budget cycles with theories of tactical electoral redistribution to test for political capture in a novel way. Studying banks in India, I find that government-owned bank lending tracks the electoral cycle, with agricultural credit increasing by 5–10 percentage points in an election year. There is significant cross-sectional targeting, with large increases in districts in which the election is particularly close. This targeting does not occur in nonelection years or in private bank lending. I show capture is costly: elections affect loan repayment, and election-year credit booms do not measurably affect agricultural output. (JEL D72, O13, O17, Q14, Q18)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy
Bucovetsky, S., Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061733 · Cited by 3,748
Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy
Hibbs, D. A. (1977) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400269712 · Cited by 3,368
The journal of financial economics
Schwert, G. W. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90012-z · Cited by 2,542
La Porta, R., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00422 · Cited by 2,511
Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355305775097524 · Cited by 2,366
(2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.i · Cited by 2,071
The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics
Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1996) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2960152 · Cited by 1,506
‘Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment’
Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054201242 · Cited by 1,480
The effects of government ownership on bank lending
Sapienza, P. (2004) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2002.10.002 · Cited by 1,363
Cited by
Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355305775097524 · Cited by 2,366
Retrospective Voting Reconsidered
Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920 · Cited by 667
Bank ownership type and banking relationships
Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., Martinez Peria, M. S., & Zaidi, R. (2008) · Journal of Financial Intermediation · doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2006.11.001 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, S.
- Venue
- American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-250
- ISSN
- 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2096027253
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 45.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fixing Market Failures or Fixing Elections? Agricultural Credit in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/app.1.1.219
- The paper
- Cole, S. (2009). Fixing Market Failures or Fixing Elections? Agricultural Credit in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.1.219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.