Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Have College Completion Rates Declined? An Analysis of Changing Student Preparation and Collegiate Resources

Bound, John, Lovenheim, Michael F, Turner, Sarah·2010·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

Rising college enrollment over the last quarter century has not been met with a proportional increase in college completion. Comparing the high school classes of 1972 and 1992, we show declines in college completion rates have been most pronounced for men who first enroll in less selective public universities and community colleges. We decompose the decline into the components due to changes in preparedness of entering students and due to changes in collegiate characteristics, including type of institution and resources per student. While both factors play some role, the supply-side characteristics are most important in explaining changes in college completion. (JEL I23)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.2.3.129

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1086/298317 · DOI
  2. 10.1198/016214502388618401 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.07.006 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2171954 · DOI
  5. 10.1257/jep.20.4.133 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/2971733 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/1467-937X.00044 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.11.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/587037 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1257/jep.23.4.95 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/1392334 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/713838186 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00057-7 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/146327 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477792 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/1392376 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.05.003 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/258728 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Bound, J., Lovenheim, M. F., & Turner, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan Department of Economics, 611 Tappan Street, 318 Lorch Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220 and National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Cornell University Department of Policy Analysis and Management, 103 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853.
  • University of Virginia Department of Economics, Monroe Hall, McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22904 and National Bureau of Economic Research.
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
129-157
ISSN
  • 1945-7782
  • 1945-7790
Cited by
213
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review