Cited by 359Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation and Public Policy

Merit Aid, College Quality, and College Completion: Massachusetts' Adams Scholarship as an In-Kind Subsidy

Cohodes, Sarah R., Goodman, Joshua S.·2014·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

We analyze a Massachusetts merit aid program that gives high-scoring students tuition waivers at in-state public colleges with lower graduation rates than available alternative colleges. A regression discontinuity design comparing students just above and below the eligibility threshold finds that students are remarkably willing to forgo college quality and that scholarship use actually lowered college completion rates. These results suggest that college quality affects college completion rates. The theoretical prediction that in-kind subsidies of public institutions can reduce consumption of the subsidized good is shown to be empirically important. (JEL H75, I22, I23, I28)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.6.4.251

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Adams Scholarship in Massachusetts shifted students towards in-state, public schools away from better-resourced options, reducing their rate of degree attainment.

    “The Adams Scholarship in Massachusetts shifted towards in-state, public schools away from better-resourced options, reducing students' their rate of degree attainment (Cohodes & Goodman, 2014).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Cohodes & Goodman, 2014

  • Massachusetts' Adams Scholarship reduced college degree completion by inducing students to enroll in in-state, public institutions rather than higher-resourced institutions they would have attended otherwise.

    “For example, Massachusetts' Adams Scholarship, actually reduced college degree completion, by inducing students to enroll in in-state, public institutions rather than the higher-resourced institutions they would have attended otherwise (Cohodes & Goodman, 2014).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Cohodes & Goodman, 2014

  • This ratio is lower than those estimated by Cohodes and Goodman (2014) and Bleemer (2018a) in other contexts.

    “a lower ratio than those estimated by Cohodes and Goodman (2014) and Bleemer (2018a) in other contexts.”

    From Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209 (2021) · cites this paper as Cohodes and Goodman (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohodes, S. R., & Goodman, J. S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
251-285
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W3124362211
Cited by
359
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9
FWCI
169.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
Keywords
merit aid, tuition waivers, college completion, university quality, public higher education, student choice, Massachusetts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review