The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cheap Talk
Abstract
Economists often ask how private information is shared through markets, costly signaling, and other mechanisms. Yet most information sharing is done through ordinary, informal talk. Economists are inconsistent in their view of such ‘cheap talk’: sometimes it is supposed that communication generally leads to efficient equilibria; other times it is supposed that since ‘talk is cheap,’ it is never credible. The authors think both views are wrong. In this paper, they describe what some recent research in game theory teaches about when people will convey private information by cheap talk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategic information transmission
Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913390 · Cited by 4,293
Cited by
Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310388419 · Cited by 6,735
The Means and End of Greenwash
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615575332 · Cited by 1,636
Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks
Acemoglu, D., & Ozdaglar, A. (2011) · Dynamic Games and Applications · doi:10.1007/s13235-010-0004-1 · Cited by 705
Repairing and Enhancing Trust: Approaches to Reducing Organizational Trust Deficits
Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2010.487403 · Cited by 398
Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games
Cai, H., & Wang, J. T.-Y. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.04.001 · Cited by 370
When Words Sweat: Identifying Signals for Loan Default in the Text of Loan Applications
Netzer, O., Lemaire, A., & Herzenstein, M. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243719852959 · Cited by 238
Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? An Experimental Comparison of Observation and Cheap Talk
Duffy, J., & Feltovich, N. (2002) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.2001.0892 · Cited by 218
Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147 · Cited by 202
Archak, N. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772694 · Cited by 187
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling
Franke, M., & Degen, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154854 · Cited by 115
Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits
Casper, S., Ezell, C., Siegmann, C., Kolt, N., Curtis, T. L., Bucknall, B., Haupt, A., Wei, K., Scheurer, J., Hobbhahn, M., et al. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659037 · Cited by 86
Neural computations underpinning the strategic management of influence in advice giving
Hertz, U., Palminteri, S., Brunetti, S., Olesen, C., Frith, C. D., & Bahrami, B. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02314-5 · Cited by 77
MONEY TALKS? AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF CHEAP TALK AND BURNED MONEY
de Haan, T., Offerman, T., & Sloof, R. (2015) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12141 · Cited by 15
How could we make a social robot? A virtual bargaining approach
Chater, N. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0040 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, J., & Rabin, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 103-118
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255104966
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.