The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce
Open accessAbstract
Just as the industrial revolution mechanized the manufacturing functions of firms, the information revolution is automating their merchant functions. Four types of potential productivity gains are expected from business-to-business (B2B) electronic commerce: cost efficiencies from automation of transactions, potential advantages of new market intermediaries, consolidation of demand and supply through organized exchanges, and changes in the extent of vertical integration of firms. The article examines the characteristics of B2B online intermediaries, including categories of goods traded, market mechanisms employed, and ownership arrangements, and considers the market structure of B2B e-commerce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Cited by
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.187 · Cited by 5,564
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
ZHU, K., KRAEMER, K. L., & DEDRICK, J. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045797 · Cited by 775
Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries
Evans, D. S. (2003) · Review of Network Economics · doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1026 · Cited by 605
Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms
Bakos, Y., & Katsamakas, E. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250208 · Cited by 235
Business‐to‐business e‐procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation
Angeles, R., & Nath, R. (2007) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540710737299 · Cited by 184
Ozok, A. A., Fan, Q., & Norcio, A. F. (2010) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290903004012 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucking-Reiley, D., & Spulber, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-68
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161209922
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 124.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
