Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The New Demographic Transition: Most Gains in Life Expectancy Now Realized Late in Life

Eggleston, Karen N, Fuchs, Victor R·2012·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

The share of increases in life expectancy realized after age 65 was only about 20 percent at the beginning of the 20th century for the United States and 16 other countries at comparable stages of development; but that share was close to 80 percent by the dawn of the 21st century, and is almost certainly approaching 100 percent asymptotically. This new demographic transition portends a diminished survival effect on working life. For high-income countries at the forefront of the longevity transition, expected lifetime labor force participation as a percent of life expectancy is declining. Innovative policies are needed if societies wish to preserve a positive relationship running from increasing longevity to greater prosperity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.26.3.137

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1093/oxrep/grq038 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/wber/12.3.419 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Costa Dora L, 1998, An American Economic History, 1880
  4. 10.1257/jep.14.4.101 · DOI
  5. 10.1257/jep.20.3.97 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/000271624523700102 · DOI
  7. Fogel Robert W, 1994, American Economic Review, 84, 369
  8. Galor Oded, 1996, American Economic Review, 86, 374
  9. 10.1257/jel.49.3.589 · DOI
  10. 10.3982/ECTA8107 · DOI
  11. 10.5085/0898-5510-14.3.203 · DOI
  12. Lazear Edward P, 1981, American Economic Review, 71, 606
  13. 10.1257/089533003772034943 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00375.x · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00380.x · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2061660 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.111152298 · DOI
  19. Miller N. Grant, 2012, A Provincial Analysis, 1950
  20. 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00168-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/508033 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1126/science.1209396 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1086/261725 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Smith Shirley J, 1982, Monthly Labor Review, 105, 15
  25. 10.1002/hec.1590 · DOI
  26. Zeckhauser Richard J, 1985, Health Intervention and Population Heterogeneity: Evidence from Japan and the United States, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
Eggleston, K. N., & Fuchs, V. R.
Affiliations
  • Director of the Stanford Asia Health Policy Program and Center Fellow at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Henry J. Kaiser, Jr., Professor Emeritus in the Departments of Economics and of Health Research and Policy, and Senior Fellow, Stanford Institute of Economic Policy and Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2012-08-01
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
137-156
ISSN
0895-3309
Cited by
95
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Demographic Transition: Most Gains in Life Expectancy Now Realized Late in Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jep.26.3.137
The paper
Eggleston, K. N., & Fuchs, V. R. (2012). The New Demographic Transition: Most Gains in Life Expectancy Now Realized Late in Life. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.3.137