Cited by 3,917Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityDigital Economy and Work TransformationEconomic Growth and Productivity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation

Open access
Autor, David H.·2015·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

In this essay, I begin by identifying the reasons that automation has not wiped out a majority of jobs over the decades and centuries. Automation does indeed substitute for labor—as it is typically intended to do. However, automation also complements labor, raises output in ways that leads to higher demand for labor, and interacts with adjustments in labor supply. Journalists and even expert commentators tend to overstate the extent of machine substitution for human labor and ignore the strong complementarities between automation and labor that increase productivity, raise earnings, and augment demand for labor. Changes in technology do alter the types of jobs available and what those jobs pay. In the last few decades, one noticeable change has been a “polarization” of the labor market, in which wage gains went disproportionately to those at the top and at the bottom of the income and skill distribution, not to those in the middle; however, I also argue, this polarization and is unlikely to continue very far into future. The final section of this paper reflects on how recent and future advances in artificial intelligence and robotics should shape our thinking about the likely trajectory of occupational change and employment growth. I argue that the interplay between machine and human comparative advantage allows computers to substitute for workers in performing routine, codifiable tasks while amplifying the comparative advantage of workers in supplying problem-solving skills, adaptability, and creativity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.29.3.3

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 46 references

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alpert Andrew, 2003, Monthly Labor Review, 13
  2. Autor David H, 2015, Re-Evaluating Labor Market Dynamics, 129
  3. US Bureau of the Census., 1949, Series D, 134

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Autor, D. H.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Autor, David H.
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
3-30
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1821977771
Cited by
3,917
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 697 · 2025: 579 · 2024: 457 · 2023: 364 · 2022: 309 · 2021: 345 · 2020: 349 · 2019: 312 · 2018: 263 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 9
FWCI
398.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
workplace automation, labor substitution, labor complementarity, labor demand, labor supply, labor market polarization, wage inequality, artificial intelligence, robotics, career change, job creation, routine tasks, problem-solving skills, comparative advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review