The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women in Economics: Stalled Progress
Open accessAbstract
Women are still a minority in the economics profession. By the mid-2000s, just under 35 percent of PhD students and 30 percent of assistant professors were female, and these numbers have remained roughly constant ever since. Over the past two decades, women’s progress in academic economics has slowed, with virtually no improvement in the female share of junior faculty or graduate students in decades. Little consensus has emerged as to why, though there has been a renewal of widespread interest in the status and future of women in economics and of the barriers they face to professional success. In this paper, we first document trends in the gender composition of academic economists over the past 25 years, the extent to which these trends encompass the most elite departments, and how women’s representation across fields of study within economics has changed. We then review the recent literature on other dimensions of women’s relative position in the discipline, including research productivity and income, and assess evidence on the barriers that female economists face in publishing, promotion, and tenure. While differences in preferences and constraints may directly affect the relative productivity of men and women, productivity gaps do not fully explain the gender disparity in promotion rates in economics. Furthermore, the progress of women has stalled relative to that in other disciplines in the past two decades. We propose that differential assessment of men and women is one important factor in explaining this stalled progress, reflected in gendered institutional policies and apparent implicit bias in promotion and tenure processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Filders, R. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90130-2 · Cited by 16,165
(2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.5.i · Cited by 15,100
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100614541236 · Cited by 1,019
Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1018839203698 · Cited by 736
Fourcade, M., Ollion, E., & Algan, Y. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.1.89 · Cited by 717
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.
Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016539 · Cited by 554
Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability
Babcock, L., Recalde, M. P., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141734 · Cited by 507
Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?
Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2004) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330042162386 · Cited by 429
Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
Bayer, A., & Rouse, C. E. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.221 · Cited by 384
Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?
Hamermesh, D. S. (2013) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.51.1.162 · Cited by 380
Cited by
How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists
van Dalen, H. P. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03786-x · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundberg, S., & Stearns, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2019-02-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-22
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911089814
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 48.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women in Economics: Stalled Progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jep.33.1.3
- The paper
- Lundberg, S., & Stearns, J. (2019). Women in Economics: Stalled Progress. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.