Cited by 33Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Identifying barriers to the use of research faced by public health physicians in Norway and developing an intervention to reduce them

Forsetlund, Louise, Bjørndal, Arild·2002·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Abstract

Objectives: To explore why public health physicians seldom use research-based information and to develop an intervention to remedy this on the basis of this study, other research literature and suitable theories of information-seeking and professional behaviour change. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups, observation of individuals and interviews. The setting was Norwegian public health practice; 52 public health physicians from all over Norway participated in the study. Results: We identified several barriers to the use of scientific literature that could be categorised as: psychological variables; environmental variables; and source characteristics. We developed an intervention that attempts to address these barriers, informed by previous research on the effectiveness of interventions to change professional practice and incorporating elements from social cognitive theories and the theory of innovation diffusion. Conclusions: The Norwegian public health physician works in an isolated environment which does not facilitate searching or obtaining scientific information, which does not ask for this information and far less encourages its use as a basis for decision-making. An intervention tailored to reduce some of the barriers to research use may lead to more frequent and extensive use of such information in public health decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1355819021927629

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forsetlund, L., & Bjørndal, A.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
10-18
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2139480602
Cited by
33
References
28
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
research utilization, evidence-based practice, public health physicians, barriers to research use, information seeking, intervention development, social cognitive theory, public health decision-making
MeSH terms
Anecdotes as Topic, Attitude of Health Personnel, Decision Making, Humans, Information Services, Interviews as Topic, Norway, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Public Health Practice, Focus Groups, Rural Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review