Cited by 287Health Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral Health and InterventionsInnovations in Medical Education

Methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour: a systematic review

Open access
Colquhoun, Heather L., Squires, Janet E., Kolehmainen, Niina, Fraser, Cynthia, Grimshaw, Jeremy M.·2017·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews consistently indicate that interventions to change healthcare professional (HCP) behaviour are haphazardly designed and poorly specified. Clarity about methods for designing and specifying interventions is needed. The objective of this review was to identify published methods for designing interventions to change HCP behaviour. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO was conducted from 1996 to April 2015. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria, a broad screen of abstracts by one rater was followed by a strict screen of full text for all potentially relevant papers by three raters. An inductive approach was first applied to the included studies to identify commonalities and differences between the descriptions of methods across the papers. Based on this process and knowledge of related literatures, we developed a data extraction framework that included, e.g. level of change (e.g. individual versus organization); context of development; a brief description of the method; tasks included in the method (e.g. barrier identification, component selection, use of theory). RESULTS: 3966 titles and abstracts and 64 full-text papers were screened to yield 15 papers included in the review, each outlining one design method. All of the papers reported methods developed within a specific context. Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers. Thirteen papers targeted individual HCPs with only one paper targeting change across individual, organization, and system levels. The use of theory and user engagement were included in 13/15 and 13/15 papers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is an agreement across methods of four tasks that need to be completed when designing individual-level interventions: identifying barriers, selecting intervention components, using theory, and engaging end-users. Methods also consist of further additional tasks. Examples of methods for designing the organisation and system-level interventions were limited. Further analysis of design tasks could facilitate the development of detailed guidelines for designing interventions.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review identified 15 published methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour. Across these methods, four design tasks were commonly included: barrier identification, linking barriers to intervention components, using theory, and engaging end-users.

Key findings

  • From 3966 screened citations and 64 full-text papers, 15 papers were included, each outlining one design method; methods were published between 2001 and 2014.
  • 13/15 papers included barrier identification and 13/15 linked barriers to intervention components, though these were not the same 13 papers; 13/15 used theory and 13/15 included user engagement.
  • 13/15 methods targeted individual healthcare professionals, while only one method targeted change across individual, organization, and system levels.
  • Design tasks ranged from 2 to 7 steps, with a median of 5 tasks; 11/15 methods incorporated other published approaches, tools, or resources.

Methods

  • Systematic review searching MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from 1996 to April 2015, with no published protocol; inclusion required a paper to describe a method for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals’ behaviour and focus primarily on the intervention design process.
  • Title/abstract screening was done by one rater, followed by full-text screening by three raters independently; mean Kappa across all pairs was .43, indicating moderate agreement.
  • Data extraction used a two-stage process: an inductive framework was developed by three reviewers, then data were extracted by two individuals independently followed by consensus discussion for discrepancies.

Limitations

  • The paper states that only one rater screened titles and abstracts, which may have increased the possibility of omitting relevant studies; it also did not include books or book chapters, excluded studies that reported intervention testing alongside development, did not search grey literature, and used only three databases, making the review susceptible to publication bias.
  • The paper states that all included methods were developed specifically for healthcare environments, and methods from other disciplines or before 1996 may have been missed.
  • The paper notes that it did not measure the degree to which the identified methods are used; the text also makes evident that the search ended in April 2015 and excluded non-English articles.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-017-0560-5

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 82 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Thirteen of the 15 included papers targeted individual healthcare professionals.

    “Thirteen papers targeted individual HCPs with only one paper targeting change across individual, organization, and system levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The 13 papers that included barrier identification and the 13 that included linking barriers to intervention components were not the same 13 papers.

    “Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Use of theory was included in 13 of the 15 papers.

    “The use of theory and user engagement were included in 13/15 and 13/15 papers, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Thirteen of the 15 included papers included barrier identification.

    “Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    All 15 included papers reported methods developed within a specific context.

    “All of the papers reported methods developed within a specific context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Thirteen of the 15 included papers included linking barriers to intervention components.

    “Thirteen papers included barrier identification and 13 included linking barriers to intervention components; although not the same 13 papers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The systematic review identified 15 papers, each outlining one design method for interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour.

    “3966 titles and abstracts and 64 full-text papers were screened to yield 15 papers included in the review, each outlining one design method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The search strategy and databases used were sufficient to identify all relevant published methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the papers that covered barrier identification, the methods used included observations, interviews and/or focus groups, surveys, literature reviews, structured reflection by researchers, job analysis and expert consensus, and predictive studies to identify factors influencing behaviour.

    “In the papers where barrier identification was covered, the methods included observations, interviews and/or focus groups [14, 18, 30–32], surveys [32], literature reviews [24], structured reflection by the researchers [32], job analysis and expert consensus [18], and undertaking a predictive study to identify factors influencing the behaviour [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [14] Curran GM, Mukherjee S, Allee E, Owen RR. A process for developing an implementation intervention: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3(1):17. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Battles J. Improving patient safety by instructional systems design. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 suppl 1:i25–9. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Chandler C, Meta J, Ponzo C, Nasuwa F, Kessy J, Mbakilwa H, Haaland A, Reyburn H. The development of effective behaviour change interventions to support the use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests by Tanzanian clinicians. Implement Sci. 2014;9:83. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M. Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):90. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Flottorp S. Improving prescribing of antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering drugs: a method for identifying and addressing barriers to change. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):23. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Clyne B, Bradley MC, Hughes CM, Clear D, McDonnell R, Williams D, Fahey T, Smith SM. Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):307. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] Foy R, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, Grimshaw J. The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:207. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    One of the 15 papers (Kolehmainen et al. [22]) assumed barriers had already been identified in previous work and provided a method for linking barriers to intervention components.

    “One of these papers [22] reported an assumption that barriers had already been identified in previous work and provided a method for linking barriers to intervention components.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Kolehmainen N, Francis JJ. Specifying content and mechanisms of change in interventions to change professionals’ practice: an illustration from the Good Goals study in occupational therapy. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):100. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Five of the 15 included papers incorporated just one other published tool.

    “Five of 15 incorporated just one other published tool [20, 24, 26–28]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [20] Van Bokhoven M, Kok G, Van der Weijden T. Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(3):215–20. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Clyne B, Bradley MC, Hughes CM, Clear D, McDonnell R, Williams D, Fahey T, Smith SM. Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):307. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Sassen B, Kok G, Mesters I, Crutzen R, Cremers A, Vanhees L. A web-based intervention for health professionals and patients to decrease cardiovascular risk attributable to physical inactivity: development process. JMIR Res Protocols. 2012;1(2):e21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Schmid AA, Andersen J, Kent T, Williams LS, Damush TM. Using intervention mapping to develop and adapt a secondary stroke prevention program in Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):11. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] Foy R, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, Grimshaw J. The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:207. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    One of the 15 included papers incorporated three published tools.

    “and one incorporated three published tools [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Porcheret M, Main C, Croft P, McKinley R, Hassell A, Dziedzic K. Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):42. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Two of the 15 included papers incorporated the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework.

    “and two incorporated the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework [22, 24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Kolehmainen N, Francis JJ. Specifying content and mechanisms of change in interventions to change professionals’ practice: an illustration from the Good Goals study in occupational therapy. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):100. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Clyne B, Bradley MC, Hughes CM, Clear D, McDonnell R, Williams D, Fahey T, Smith SM. Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):307. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One of the 15 papers (Cabassa et al. [23]) focused on adapting an intervention using stakeholder engagement and did not address barrier identification specifically.

    “The other paper [23] focused on adapting an intervention using stakeholder engagement and did not address barrier identification specifically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Cabassa LJ, Druss B, Wang Y, Lewis-Fernández R. Collaborative planning approach to inform the implementation of a healthcare manager intervention for Hispanics with serious mental illness: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:80. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Eccles et al. [38] includes a description of using a theory to design a KT intervention.

    “One of these was Eccles et al. [38] which includes a description of using a theory to design a KT intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(2):107–12. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Among the papers that linked barriers to intervention components, methods included mapping TDF barriers to the BCT taxonomy and using the structured approaches described in Intervention Mapping.

    “Methods to link barriers to intervention components included mapping TDF-barriers to the BCT taxonomy [19, 21, 25], as well as using the structured approaches described in Intervention Mapping [20, 26, 27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [19] Taylor N, Lawton R, Slater B, Foy R. The demonstration of a theory-based approach to the design of localized patient safety interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):123. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, Buchbinder R, Schattner P, Spike N, Grimshaw JM. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):38. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] Porcheret M, Main C, Croft P, McKinley R, Hassell A, Dziedzic K. Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):42. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] Van Bokhoven M, Kok G, Van der Weijden T. Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(3):215–20. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Sassen B, Kok G, Mesters I, Crutzen R, Cremers A, Vanhees L. A web-based intervention for health professionals and patients to decrease cardiovascular risk attributable to physical inactivity: development process. JMIR Res Protocols. 2012;1(2):e21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Schmid AA, Andersen J, Kent T, Williams LS, Damush TM. Using intervention mapping to develop and adapt a secondary stroke prevention program in Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):11. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In two of the 15 papers, gathering input included formal cognitive interviews.

    “In two cases, this included formal cognitive interviews [28, 31].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] Foy R, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Eccles M, Lecouturier J, Bamford C, Grimshaw J. The development of a theory-based intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:207. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M. Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):90. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Intervention Mapping paper [29] outlined a method for intervention design for health behaviours, not for HCPs' behaviours, and was therefore excluded.

    “This paper outlined a method for intervention design for health behaviours, not for HCPs’ behaviours, and was therefore excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    All of the included methods were developed specifically for healthcare environments.

    “All of the included methods were developed specifically for healthcare environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are limited methods that specifically take organisation and system level contexts into consideration, or that consider all levels.

    “We found limited methods to specifically take the organisation and system level contexts into consideration, as well as methods that consider all levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Limited methods target change in organisations or systems, or were developed with a focus on the organization or system.

    “First, limited methods target change in organisations or systems, or at least were developed with a focus on the organization or system.”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
      “Methods for designing organisation and system-level interventions were limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    One of the 15 papers (Cabassa et al. [23]) focused on adapting an intervention using stakeholder engagement and did not address linking barriers to intervention components specifically.

    “As mentioned, one of these papers [23] focused on adapting an intervention using stakeholder engagement and did not address linking to intervention components specifically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Cabassa LJ, Druss B, Wang Y, Lewis-Fernández R. Collaborative planning approach to inform the implementation of a healthcare manager intervention for Hispanics with serious mental illness: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:80. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Examples of specific theories used included Social Cognitive Theory to design a computer-delivered intervention to enhance use of practice guidelines in general practices, and theories of risk perception to improve physical activity in cardiovascular patients as part of Intervention Mapping.

    “Examples included using Social Cognitive Theory [33] to design a computer-delivered intervention to enhance the use of practice guidelines in general practices [31], and using theories of risk perception to improve physical activity in cardiovascular patients as part of the Intervention Mapping process [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [33] Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M. Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):90. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Sassen B, Kok G, Mesters I, Crutzen R, Cremers A, Vanhees L. A web-based intervention for health professionals and patients to decrease cardiovascular risk attributable to physical inactivity: development process. JMIR Res Protocols. 2012;1(2):e21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Eccles et al. [38] provided a rationale and description of conceptual issues related to using theory to develop an intervention, but the degree of detail on how to design an intervention is limited.

    “We felt this paper provided a rationale and description of conceptual issues related to using theory to develop an intervention; however, the degree of detail on how to design an intervention in this paper is limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(2):107–12. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    An interrater reliability analysis using the Kappa statistic was performed to determine consistency among raters for the full-text review.

    “An interrater reliability analysis using the Kappa statistic was performed to determine consistency among raters for the full-text review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not publish a protocol.

    “We did not publish a protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Due to resource limitations, articles not in English were excluded.

    “Due to resource limitations, we also excluded articles that were not in English.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A screen of titles and abstracts was conducted by one rater independently and was followed by a review of full papers by three raters independently.

    “A screen of titles and abstracts was conducted by one rater independently (shared by HLC, JES, NK) and was followed by a review of full papers by three raters independently (HLC, JES, NK).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Papers were included if they described a method for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour or practice and the primary focus was on the intervention design process.

    “Papers were included if two criteria were met: (1) the paper described a method (process, tasks, approach) for designing interventions to change HCPs’ behaviour or practice, and (2) the primary focus of the paper was on the intervention design process (as opposed to, e.g. on intervention evaluation).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data extraction was conducted by two individuals independently first followed by consensus discussions for discrepancies.

    “Data extraction was conducted by two individuals (HLC, JES) independently first followed by consensus discussions for discrepancies (Stage 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The mean Kappa statistic across all pairs was .43, indicating moderate agreement.

    “The mean Kappa statistic across all pairs was .43 indicated moderate agreement [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Three reviewers progressed in iterative cycles of reading and discussing included papers to identify similarities and differences and develop extraction items until agreement.

    “Three reviewers (HLC, JES, NK) progressed in iterative cycles of reading and discussing the included papers to identify similarities and differences between them and used these discussions to develop a list of items to be extracted. The iterative cycles were continued until an agreement between the three authors was reached.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Papers were excluded if they lacked enough detail for replication.

    “we excluded papers that lacked enough detail for replication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Although many methods' approaches to barrier identification could result in a focus on the organisation or system if barriers at these levels are identified, the implicit focus of these papers targeted individual behaviour change.

    “While it is true that many of the methods’ approaches to barrier identification could result in a focus on the organisation or system should barriers at these levels be identified (for example, see French et al. [21]), the implicit focus of these papers targeted individual behaviour change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, Buchbinder R, Schattner P, Spike N, Grimshaw JM. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):38. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence indicates that theory is rarely used in the design of interventions, or at least rarely reported.

    “Almost all of the methods found (13/15) used theory at some point in the tasks for intervention design, yet evidence indicates theory is rarely used in the design of interventions, or at least rarely reported [39, 40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Chalifoux M, Eva KW. A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2013;8:66. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5(14):5908–5.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Books and book chapters were not included in the search due to challenges in adequately searching books.

    “Due to the challenges in adequately searching books, we did not include books or book chapters in our search.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is likely that other methods to design interventions to change health behaviours could similarly be adopted to design interventions to change HCPs' practice.

    “It is likely that other methods to design interventions to change health behaviours could similarly be adopted to design interventions to change HCPs’ practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Grey literature was not searched, making the review susceptible to publication bias.

    “Lastly, we did not search grey literature, making the review susceptible to publication bias [42], and we only chose to use three databases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The four common steps represent a simple structure of potential prototypical steps for the design of a KT intervention.

    “While we do not necessarily understand the best order for these tasks nor do we know what additional tasks are required, it does represent a simple structure of potential prototypical steps for the design of a KT intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Only one rater was used for the title and abstract review.

    “We used only one rater for the title and abstract review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a need for a better understanding of what activities constitute intervention design.

    “The process of undertaking this review highlights a second gap: the need for a better understanding of what activities constitute intervention design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not measure the degree to which these methods are used.

    “Our review did not measure the degree to which these methods are used but this would be a useful future area of research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Only three databases were used.

    “Lastly, we did not search grey literature, making the review susceptible to publication bias [42], and we only chose to use three databases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The search strategy and databases used were sufficient to identify all relevant published methods for designing interventions to change healthcare professionals' behaviour.

    “A sensitive search strategy was designed in consultation with an information science specialist (CF) using both subject headings and text terms and comprised a combination of three facets: professional behaviour change; theory, framework or technique; and interventions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The included papers' descriptions of methods were sufficiently detailed and representative to allow extraction of the common design tasks.

    “we excluded papers that lacked enough detail for replication.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The descriptive variables selected for extraction were the most critical for understanding intervention design tasks.

    “The resulting descriptive variables to be extracted were believed to be the most critical, and it included a brief description of the design tasks.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Colquhoun and colleagues found 15 articles with replicable methods for designing strategies to change healthcare professionals' behavior.

    “Colquhoun and colleagues (56) found 15 articles with replicable methods for designing strategies to change healthcare professionals' behavior, and Powell et al. (55) proposed Intervention Mapping (58), concept mapping (59), conjoint analysis (60), and system dynamics modeling (61) as methods to aid the design, selection, and tailoring of strategies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Van Bokhoven publication year differs between table and reference

    Minor

    Table 1 dates the van Bokhoven paper to 2004, while its cited reference dates it to 2003.

  • The denominator for named methods is 12 rather than 15

    Minor

    The paper describes 15 included papers, but uses 12 as the denominator when reporting how many gave their method a formal name.

  • Cabassa publication year differs between table and reference

    Minor

    Table 1 dates the Cabassa paper to 2001, while its cited reference dates it to 2011.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colquhoun, H. L., Squires, J. E., Kolehmainen, N., Fraser, C., & Grimshaw, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Colquhoun, Heather L.
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2017-03-04
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591591866
Cited by
283
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
intervention design, behaviour change interventions, barriers to change, theory-based intervention design, user engagement, organizational change, system-level interventions, design guidelines
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Inservice Training, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Professional Practice, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review