Cited by 421Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation

Evidence-Based Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine

Grol, Richard, Grimshaw, Jeremy·1999·The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement

Abstract

Background The slow and haphazard process of translating research findings into clinical practice compromises the potential benefits of clinical research. Most quality improvement (QI) initiatives are based on the beliefs of decision makers rather than on the growing theoretical and empirical knowledge about organizational and provider behavior change. If future QI activities are to improve the translation of evidence into practice, they should be based on an understanding of the different models and strategies for implementing research evidence and the evidence base supporting their use. Evidence-based medicine should be complemented by evidence-based implementation. The evidence for different strategies of implementing change A general framework for changing practice based on theoretical perspectives and research evidence considers a variety of theoretical approaches and their contribution to an understanding of provider behavior change. The framework summarizes evidence from systematic reviews of provider behavior change, which suggest the potential of several dissemination and implementation strategies that are effective under certain conditions. Passive dissemination approaches are largely ineffective; specific strategies to implement research-based recommendations appear to be necessary to ensure practice change. Multifaceted interventions that address specific barriers to change are more likely to lead to changes in practice. PRACTICAL, FIVE-STAGE FRAMEWORK: A practica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30464-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Education is a key step when implementing change.

    “Education is a key step when implementing change (Grol & Grimshaw, 1999).”

    From Using SBAR to Communicate with Policymakers (2018) · cites this paper as Grol & Grimshaw, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Grol, Richard
Venue
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
503-513
ISSN
1070-3241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417314194
Cited by
421
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
FWCI
35.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
evidence-based practice implementation, evidence-based medicine, research-to-practice translation, provider behavior change, dissemination strategy, multicomponent intervention, barriers to change, implementation framework, guideline implementation, primary care, quality improvement
MeSH terms
Health Services Administration, Information Services, Interpersonal Relations, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review