Cited by 166Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Access to health care for people with learning disabilities in the UK: mapping the issues and reviewing the evidence

Open access
Alborz, Alison, McNally, Rosalind, Glendinning, Caroline·2005·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Abstract

Objectives: People with learning disabilities are more prone to a wide range of additional physical and mental health problems than the general population. Our aim was to map the issues and review the evidence on access to health care for these patients. The review sought to identify theory, evidence and gaps in knowledge relating to the help-seeking behaviour of people with learning disabilities and their carers, barriers and problems they experience accessing the full range of health services, and practical and effective interventions aiming to improve access to health care. Methods: A three-strand approach was adopted, involving searches of electronic databases, a consultation exercise and a mail shot to researchers and learning disability health professionals. Evidence relevant to our model of 'access' was evaluated for scientific rigour and selected papers synthesized. Results: Overall, a lack of rigorous research in this area was noted and significant gaps in the evidence base were apparent. Evidence was identified on the difficulties in identifying health needs among people with learning disabilities and the potentially empowering or obstructive influence of third parties on access to health care. Barriers to access identified within health services included problems with communication, inadequate facilities, rigid procedures and lack of appropriate interpersonal skills among mainstream health care professionals in caring for these patients. A number of innovations designed to improve access were identified, including a communication aid, a prompt card to support general practitioners, health check programmes and walk-in clinics. Conclusion: There are important gaps in the knowledge base on access to health care for this group. While these need to be addressed, developing strategies to overcome identified barriers should be a priority, along with fuller evaluation of existing innovations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1355819054338997

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [30]Nightingale CE Issues of access to health services for people with learning disabilities: a case study of cervical screening [PhD Thesis] 1997 Cambridge Anglia Polytechnic University
  2. [32]Lyon JW The oral health of adults with learning disabilities living within the community in north Warwickshire who do not access the community dental service [Thesis, Master of Dental Science] 1997 Birmingham University of Birmingham
  3. [34]Speechley M Adults with profound and multiple learning disabilities: perceived and real obstacles to accessing vision testing services [dissertation] 2002 Manchester University of Manchester
  4. [40]Kon Y Bouras N Psychiatric follow-up and health services utilisation for people with learning disabilities British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1997 43 20 26
  5. [45]Paxton D Taylor S Access to primary health care for adults with a learning disability Health Bulletin 1998 56 686 693

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alborz, A., McNally, R., & Glendinning, C.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
173-182
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2074522131
Cited by
166
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (HS&DR/08/1210/023, SDO_23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
learning disabilities, health care access, help-seeking, caregivers, barriers to health services, communication difficulties, walk-in clinics, communication aids, general practitioners, evidence gaps
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Learning Disabilities, State Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review