Cited by 153Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPhysical Activity and Health

A pilot study of long-term monitoring of human movements in the home using accelerometry

Mathie, Merryn J, Coster, Adelle C F, Lovell, Nigel H., Celler, Branko G., Lord, Stephen R, Tiedemann, Anne·2004·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of using a waist-mounted, wireless triaxial accelerometer (TA) to monitor human movements in an unsupervised home setting to detect changes in functional status. A pilot study was carried out with six healthy subjects aged 80–86 years. The subjects wore a TA unit every day for two to three months. Each morning they carried out a short routine of directed movements that included standing, sitting, lying and walking. Important movement variables were measured. During the rest of the day, subjects were monitored for falls, and variables such as metabolic energy expenditure were measured. All subjects remained healthy; there was no overall change in functional status and there were only slight fluctuations in health status. No longitudinal changes were detected in any of the variables measured during the directed routine. There was a moderate correlation between weekly self-reported health status and energy expenditure: subjects reported a lower health status for weeks in which they expended less energy. The TA system was found to be practical for long-term, unsupervised home monitoring. All subjects found the system simple to use and the TA unit unobtrusive and comfortable to wear. High compliance rates were achieved: the TA units were worn on 88% of the days in the study, for an average of 11.2 hours per day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/135763304323070788

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mathie et al showed the feasibility of using accelerometers to identify the performance of activities of daily living by older adults monitored in the home environment.

    “Mathie et al [49] showed the feasibility of using accelerometers to identify the performance of ADL by older adults monitored in the home environment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathie, M. J., Coster, A. C. F., Lovell, N. H., Celler, B. G., Lord, S. R., & Tiedemann, A.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
144-151
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2148251735
Cited by
153
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
accelerometry, triaxial accelerometer, home monitoring, older adults, functional status, long-term monitoring, energy expenditure, fall detection, self-rated health, compliance, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feasibility Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Movement, Pilot Projects, Telemetry, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review