Cited by 9COVID-19 diagnosis using AICOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial intelligence-based model for COVID-19 prognosis incorporating chest radiographs and clinical data; a retrospective model development and validation study

Open access
Walston, Shannon L, Matsumoto, Toshimasa, Miki, Yukio, Ueda, Daiju·2022·The British Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence-based model to prognosticate COVID-19 patients at admission by combining clinical data and chest radiographs. Methods: This retrospective study used the Stony Brook University COVID-19 dataset of 1384 inpatients. After exclusions, 1356 patients were randomly divided into training (1083) and test datasets (273). We implemented three artificial intelligence models, which classified mortality, ICU admission, or ventilation risk. Each model had three submodels with different inputs: clinical data, chest radiographs, and both. We showed the importance of the variables using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Results: The mortality prediction model was best overall with area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.79 (0.72–0.86), 0.74 (0.68–0.79), 0.77 (0.61–0.88), and 0.74 (0.69–0.79) for the clinical data-based model; 0.77 (0.69–0.85), 0.67 (0.61–0.73), 0.81 (0.67–0.92), 0.70 (0.64–0.75) for the image-based model, and 0.86 (0.81–0.91), 0.76 (0.70–0.81), 0.77 (0.61–0.88), 0.76 (0.70–0.81) for the mixed model. The mixed model had the best performance (p value < 0.05). The radiographs ranked fourth for prognostication overall, and first of the inpatient tests assessed. Conclusions: These results suggest that prognosis models become more accurate if AI-derived chest radiograph features and clinical data are used together. Advances in knowledge: This AI model evaluates chest radiographs together with clinical data in order to classify patients as having high or low mortality risk. This work shows that chest radiographs taken at admission have significant COVID-19 prognostic information compared to clinical data other than age and sex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/bjr.20220058

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan, with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI.

    “Furthermore, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of COVID-19-related studies from Japan has increased [54–61], with a significant increase in such research focusing on AI [62–64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2019; 32: 8026-37.
  2. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. In: Paper presented at the In: Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice. https:// doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.74 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sobin LH. TNM Online. 8th edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780471420194 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walston, S. L., Matsumoto, T., Miki, Y., & Ueda, D.
Affiliations
  • Osaka City University (JP)
  • Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
Venue
The British Journal of Radiology
Published
2022-12-01
Volume
95
Issue
1140
Pages
20220058-20220058
ISSN
  • 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-880X
OpenAlex
W4301392540
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K10415)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, prognosis, chest radiograph, mortality prediction, intensive care unit admission, clinical data, artificial intelligence, SHAP, multimodal prediction model
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Prognosis, Radiography, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review