Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 918

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis

Open access
Shuster, A, Patlas, M, Pinthus, J H, Mourtzakis, M·2012·The British Journal of Radiology

Abstract

As a result of the rising epidemic of obesity, understanding body fat distribution and its clinical implications is critical to timely treatment. Visceral adipose tissue is a hormonally active component of total body fat, which possesses unique biochemical characteristics that influence several normal and pathological processes in the human body. Abnormally high deposition of visceral adipose tissue is known as visceral obesity. This body composition phenotype is associated with medical disorders such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and several malignancies including prostate, breast and colorectal cancers. Quantitative assessment of visceral obesity is important for evaluating the potential risk of development of these pathologies, as well as providing an accurate prognosis. This review aims to compare different methods of measuring visceral adiposity with emphasis on their advantages and drawbacks in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/bjr/38447238

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1002/1520-6300(200009/10)12:5<600::AID-AJHB4>3.0.CO;2-J · doi:10.1002/1520-6300(200009/10)12:5<600::aid-ajhb4>3.0.co;2-j
  2. 10.1093/ageing/30.4.331 · doi:10.1093/ageing/30.4.331
  3. Ramos deMarins VM, 2001, Public Health, 115, 236, 10.1016/S0033-3506(01)00450-4 · doi:10.1016/s0033-3506(01)00450-4
  4. 10.1063/1.1385353 · DOI
  5. 10.1053/meta.2001.24931 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05125.x · DOI
  8. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940715)74:2<632::AID-CNCR2820740215>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940715)74:2<632::aid-cncr2820740215>3.0.co;2-t
  9. 10.1038/oby.2004.242 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10350-008-9395-0 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0828-282X(08)71045-6 · DOI
  12. Busetto L, 2001, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 11, 195
  13. 10.1016/S1096-6374(98)80018-X · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802695 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.044 · DOI
  17. Kvist H, 1988, Am J Clin Nutr, 48, 1351, 10.1093/ajcn/48.6.1351 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ball SD, 2003, J Exerc Physiol Online, 6, 1
  19. 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1692 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Seidell JC, 1988, Eur J Clin Nutr, 42, 805
  21. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00728.x · DOI
  22. 10.1139/H08-075 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1620/tjem.214.105 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.orcp.2008.09.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s005209900104 · DOI
  27. Treuth MS, 1995, Am J Clin Nutr, 62, 527, 10.1093/ajcn/62.3.527 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/oby.2007.629 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801121 · DOI
  30. Armellini F, 1993, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 17, 209
  31. 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90284-V · DOI · Paper page
  32. Bellisari A, 1993, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 17, 475
  33. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801734 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/jcu.1870180707 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/BF02481220 · doi:10.1007/bf02481220
  36. Van der KK, 1993, Int J Obes, 17, 187
  37. 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap15283 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801921 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/oby.2002.35 · DOI
  40. Ross R, 1992, J Appl Physiol, 72, 787, 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.2.787 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/oby.2003.3 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Thomas EL, 1998, J Appl Physiol, 85, 1778, 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.5.1778 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800530 · DOI
  44. Shen W, 2004, Am J Clin Nutr, 80, 271, 10.1093/ajcn/80.2.271 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Bosy-Westphal A, 2008, Obes Facts, 1, 319, 10.1159/000176061 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1161/01.ATV.18.11.1716 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/oby.2005.252 · DOI
  48. 10.1161/01.HYP.38.3.713 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801734 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1385/ENDO:27:3:295 · DOI
  51. 10.1097/00008483-200303000-00008 · DOI
  52. 10.1530/eje.0.1490561 · DOI
  53. Thaete FL, 1995, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 19, 464
  54. Demerath EW, 2007, Am J Clin Nutr, 85, 362, 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.362 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.mri.2007.06.006 · DOI

Cited by

See all 918

Metadata

Authors
Shuster, A., Patlas, M., Pinthus, J. H., & Mourtzakis, M.
Venue
The British Journal of Radiology
Published
2012-01
Volume
85
Issue
1009
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-880X
OpenAlex
W2082037132
Cited by
918
References
6
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/bjr/38447238
The paper
Shuster, A., Patlas, M., Pinthus, J. H., & Mourtzakis, M. (2012). The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/38447238

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.