Cited by 638Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietBone health and osteoporosis research

Body-composition assessment via air-displacement plethysmography in adults and children: a review

Open access
Fields, David A, Goran, Michael I, McCrory, Megan A·2002·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Laboratory-based body-composition techniques include hydrostatic weighing (HW), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), measurement of total body water (TBW) by isotope dilution, measurement of total body potassium, and multicompartment models. Although these reference methods are used routinely, each has inherent practical limitations. Whole-body air-displacement plethysmography is a new practical alternative to these more traditional body-composition methods. We reviewed the principal findings from studies published between December 1995 and August 2001 that compared the BOD POD method (Life Measurement, Inc, Concord, CA) with reference methods and summarized factors contributing to the different study findings. The average of the study means indicates that the BOD POD and HW agree within 1% body fat (BF) for adults and children, whereas the BOD POD and DXA agree within 1% BF for adults and 2% BF for children. Few studies have compared the BOD POD with multicompartment models; those that have suggest a similar average underestimation of approximate 2-3% BF by both the BOD POD and HW. Individual variations between 2-compartment models compared with DXA and 4 -compartment models are partly attributable to deviations from the assumed chemical composition of the body. Wide variations among study means, -4.0% to 1.9% BF for BOD POD - HW and -3.0% to 1.7% BF for BOD POD - DXA, are likely due in part to differences in laboratory equipment, study design, and subject characteristics and in some cases to failure to follow the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Wide intersubject variations between methods are partly attributed to technical precision and biological error but to a large extent remain unexplained. On the basis of this review, future research goals are suggested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/75.3.453

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dell RB. Comparison of densitometric methods applicable to infants and small children for studying body composition. Report of the 98th Ross Conference in Pediatric Research. Columbus, OH: Ross Laboratories, 1989:22-30.
  2. Petty DH, Iwanski R, Gap CX, Dressendorfer RH. Total body plethysmography for body volume determination. IEEE Frontiers Eng Computing Health Care, 1984;6:316-9.
  3. Higgins PB, Fields DA, Gower BA, Hunter GR. The effect of scalp and facial hair on body fat estimates by the BOD POD. Obes Res 2001;9:326-30.
  4. Levitt MD, Hirsch P, Fetzer CA, Sheahan M, Levine AS. H 2 excre- tion after ingestion of complex carbohydrates. Gastroenterology 1987;92:383-9.
  5. McCrory MA, Fuss PJ, Saltzman E, Hays NP, Roberts SB. Body composition measurements by air-displacement plethysmography and underwater weighing: effects of gas-producing and gas-contain- ing foods. FASEB J 2000;14:A498 (abstr).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fields, D. A., Goran, M. I., & McCrory, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
453-467
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1957255860
Cited by
638
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
body composition, air displacement plethysmography, BOD POD, hydrostatic weighing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, fat mass, measurement agreement, multi-compartment model, total body water, children, adults, measurement error
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Body Water, Child, Female, Humans, Isotopes, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Obesity, Plethysmography, Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review