Cited by 49RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA regulation and disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward predicting self-splicing and protein-facilitated splicing of group I introns

Open access

Abstract

In the current era of massive discoveries of noncoding RNAs within genomes, being able to infer a function from a nucleotide sequence is of paramount interest. Although studies of individual group I introns have identified self-splicing and nonself-splicing examples, there is no overall understanding of the prevalence of self-splicing or the factors that determine it among the >2300 group I introns sequenced to date. Here, the self-splicing activities of 12 group I introns from various organisms were assayed under six reaction conditions that had been shown previously to promote RNA catalysis for different RNAs. Besides revealing that assessing self-splicing under only one condition can be misleading, this survey emphasizes that in vitro self-splicing efficiency is correlated with the GC content of the intron (>35% GC was generally conductive to self-splicing), and with the ability of the introns to form particular tertiary interactions. Addition of the Neurospora crassa CYT-18 protein activated splicing of two nonself-splicing introns, but inhibited the second step of self-splicing for two others. Together, correlations between sequence, predicted structure and splicing begin to establish rules that should facilitate our ability to predict the self-splicing activity of any group I intron from its sequence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.1027208

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native group I introns have an average intervening region between the 5′ and 3′ splice sites of 300-500 nucleotides.

    “Indeed, the intervening region between the 5′ and 3′ splice sites of native group I introns is on average 300–500 nucleotides long22, while the intervening region of the engineered RNA that we constructed was two to four-fold longer.”

    From Engineering circular RNA for potent and stable translation in eukaryotic cells (2018) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results section reports that 12 group I introns tested were 183–421 nucleotides long, and Intron selection gives a range of 183–496 nucleotides for introns requested. Neither passage establishes a 300–500-nucleotide average for native group I introns generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vicens, Q., Paukstelis, P. J., Westhof, E., Lambowitz, A. M., & Cech, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
RNA
Published
2008-09-03
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
2013-2029
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2110018116
Cited by
49
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (GM037951)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R37GM037951, R01GM037951, GM037951)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
group I introns, self-splicing, GC content, tertiary interactions, Neurospora crassa, RNA catalysis, sequence-structure-function relationships
MeSH terms
Base Composition, Base Sequence, Catalysis, Introns, Neurospora crassa, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, Tyrosine-tRNA Ligase, RNA, Catalytic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review