Cited by 319

Sorting of Drosophila small silencing RNAs partitions microRNA* strands into the RNA interference pathway

Ghildiyal, Megha, Xu, Jia, Seitz, Hervé, Weng, Zhiping, Zamore, Phillip D.·2010·RNA

Abstract

In flies, small silencing RNAs are sorted between Argonaute1 (Ago1), the central protein component of the microRNA (miRNA) pathway, and Argonaute2 (Ago2), which mediates RNA interference. Extensive double-stranded character—as is found in small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)—directs duplexes into Ago2, whereas central mismatches, like those found in miRNA/miRNA* duplexes, direct duplexes into Ago1. Central to this sorting decision is the affinity of the small RNA duplex for the Dcr-2/R2D2 heterodimer, which loads small RNAs into Ago2. Here, we show that while most Drosophila miRNAs are bound to Ago1, miRNA* strands accumulate bound to Ago2. Like siRNA loading, efficient loading of miRNA* strands in Ago2 favors duplexes with a paired central region and requires both Dcr-2 and R2D2. Those miRNA and miRNA* sequences bound to Ago2, like siRNAs diced in vivo from long double-stranded RNA, typically begin with cytidine, whereas Ago1-bound miRNA and miRNA* disproportionately begin with uridine. Consequently, some pre-miRNA generate two or more isoforms from the same side of the stem that differentially partition between Ago1 and Ago2. Our findings provide the first genome-wide test for the idea that Drosophila small RNAs are sorted between Ago1 and Ago2 according to their duplex structure and the identity of their first nucleotide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.1972910

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some cases, both arms of the miRNA duplex give rise to functional mature miRNAs that are loaded into Argonaute proteins to regulate gene expression.

    “However, in some cases, both arms of the duplex give rise to functional mature miRNAs that are loaded into Argonaute proteins to regulate gene expression (Ghildiyal, Xu, Seitz, Weng, & Zamore, 2009; Okamura, Liu, & Lai, 2009).”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Ghildiyal, Xu, Seitz, Weng, & Zamore, 2009

  • The most commonly observed 5' nucleotide of miRNA guide strands is Uracil, whereas the passenger strand often begins with Cytosine at the 5' end.

    “Consistently, the most commonly observed 5′ nucleotide of miRNA guide strands is a Uracil, whereas the passenger strand often begins with a Cytosine at the 5′ end (Ghildiyal et al., 2009; Mi et al., 2008; Takeda, Iwasaki, Watanabe, Utsumi, & Watanabe, 2008; Warf, Johnson, & Bass, 2011; Figure 2c).”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Ghildiyal et al., 2009

  • In fly ovaries, the miR-92a-3p, miR-988-3p, and miR-284-5p strands are expressed at higher levels than their corresponding passenger strands, while the miR-92a-5p, miR-988-5p, and miR-284-3p strands are expressed in excess within fly heads.

    “In fly ovaries, the miR‐92a‐3p, miR‐988‐3p, and miR‐284‐5p strands are expressed at higher levels than their corresponding passenger strands, while the miR‐92a‐5p, miR‐988‐5p, and miR‐284‐3p strands are expressed in excess within fly heads (Ghildiyal et al., 2009).”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Ghildiyal et al., 2009

  • Similar observations have been reported in flies, where several miRNA duplexes were found to exhibit tissue-specific differences in miRNA strand selection.

    “Similar observations have been reported in flies, where several miRNA duplexes were found to exhibit tissue‐specific differences in miRNA strand selection (Ghildiyal et al., 2009).”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Ghildiyal et al., 2009

  • While often supported by in vivo observations, how well the rules of miRNA strand selection hold up in a living organism throughout its lifespan is yet to be established.

    “While often supported by in vivo observations, such as the observation that most miRNAs begin with a 5′ Uracil (Ghildiyal et al., 2009; Mi et al., 2008; Takeda et al., 2008; Warf et al., 2011), how well these rules hold up in a living organism throughout its lifespan is yet to be established.”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Ghildiyal et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fo ¨rstemann K, Tomari Y, Du T, Vagin VV, Denli AM, Bratu DP, Klattenhoff C, Theurkauf WE, Zamore PD. 2005. Normal micro- RNA maturation and germ-line stem cell maintenance requires Loquacious, a double-stranded RNA-binding domain protein. PLoS Biol 3: e236. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.056. · DOI
  2. Grun D, Wang YL, Langenberger D, Gunsalus KC, Rajewsky N. 2005. microRNA target predictions across seven Drosophila species and comparison to mammalian targets. PLoS Comput Biol 1: e13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010013. · DOI
  3. Lee YS, Carthew RW. 2003. Making a better RNAi vector for Drosophila: Use of intron spacers. Methods 30: 322-329. Drosophila miRNA* strands loaded in Ago2 www.rnajournal.org 55 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press on August 2, 2023 -Published by rnajournal.cshlp.org Downloaded from
  4. Saito K, Ishizuka A, Siomi H, Siomi MC. 2005. Processing of pre- microRNAs by the Dicer-1-Loquacious complex in Drosophila cells. PLoS Biol 3: e235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030235. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghildiyal, M., Xu, J., Seitz, H., Weng, Z., & Zamore, P. D.
Venue
RNA
Published
2009-11-16
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
43-56
ISSN
  • 1355-8382
  • 1469-9001
Cited by
319
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review