The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition
Open accessAbstract
Estimates of missense error rates (misreading) during protein synthesis vary from 10 −3 to 10 −4 per codon. The experiments reporting these rates have measured several distinct errors using several methods and reporter systems. Variation in reported rates may reflect real differences in rates among the errors tested or in sensitivity of the reporter systems. To develop a more accurate understanding of the range of error rates, we developed a system to quantify the frequency of every possible misreading error at a defined codon in Escherichia coli . This system uses an essential lysine in the active site of firefly luciferase. Mutations in Lys529 result in up to a 1600-fold reduction in activity, but the phenotype varies with amino acid. We hypothesized that residual activity of some of the mutant genes might result from misreading of the mutant codons by tRNA Lys UUUU , the cognate tRNA for the lysine codons, AAA and AAG. Our data validate this hypothesis and reveal details about relative missense error rates of near-cognate codons. The error rates in E. coli do, in fact, vary widely. One source of variation is the effect of competition by cognate tRNAs for the mutant codons; higher error frequencies result from lower competition from low-abundance tRNAs. We also used the system to study the effect of ribosomal protein mutations known to affect error rates and the effect of error-inducing antibiotics, finding that they affect misreading on only a subset of near-cognate codons and that their effect may be less general than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carter, A. P., Clemons, W. M., Brodersen, D. E., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Wimberly, B. T., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35030019 · Cited by 1,615
Hopfield, J. J. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.10.4135 · Cited by 1,594
Recognition of Cognate Transfer RNA by the 30 S Ribosomal Subunit
Ogle, J. M., Brodersen, D. E., Clemons, W. M., Tarry, M. J., Carter, A. P., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060612 · Cited by 1,162
Amann, E., Ochs, B., & Abel, K.-J. (1988) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(88)90440-4 · Cited by 1,061
Ikemura, T. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90363-6 · Cited by 875
Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination
Ninio, J. (1975) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/s0300-9084(75)80139-8 · Cited by 758
Selection of tRNA by the Ribosome Requires a Transition from an Open to a Closed Form
Ogle, J. M., Murphy, F. V., Tarry, M. J., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01086-3 · Cited by 663
STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS INTO TRANSLATIONAL FIDELITY
Ogle, J. M., & Ramakrishnan, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.061903.155440 · Cited by 588
Cloning of firefly luciferase cDNA and the expression of active luciferase in Escherichia coli.
de Wet, J. R., Wood, K. V., Helinski, D. R., & DeLuca, M. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.23.7870 · Cited by 517
Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code
Parker, J. (1989) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.53.3.273-298.1989 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Evolution of the mutation rate
Lynch, M. (2010) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003 · Cited by 1,151
Codon optimality, bias and usage in translation and mRNA decay
Hanson, G., & Coller, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.91 · Cited by 825
tRNA biology charges to the front
Phizicky, E. M., & Hopper, A. K. (2010) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1956510 · Cited by 768
Encoding multiple unnatural amino acids via evolution of a quadruplet-decoding ribosome
Neumann, H., Wang, K., Davis, L., Garcia-Alai, M., & Chin, J. W. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08817 · Cited by 622
The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis
Allan Drummond, D., & Wilke, C. O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2662 · Cited by 515
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramer, E. B., & Farabaugh, P. J.
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-11-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-96
- ISSN
- 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9001
- OpenAlex
- W2141997506
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1261/rna.294907
- The paper
- Kramer, E. B., & Farabaugh, P. J. (2007). The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.294907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.