Cited by 81Treatment of Major DepressionAnesthesia and Pain ManagementCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Use of Various Doses of S-Ketamine in Treatment of Depression and Pain in Cervical Carcinoma Patients with Mild/Moderate Depression After Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy

Open access
Wang, Jie, Wang, Yajun, Xu, Xudong, Peng, Sheng, Xu, Feng, Liu, Peirong·2020·Medical Science Monitor

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study investigated the effects of various doses of S-ketamine on depression and pain management of cervical carcinoma patients with mild/moderate depression. MATERIAL AND METHODS This randomized, double-blind, controlled study included 417 cervical carcinoma patients who received laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy from April 2015 to July 2018 and who also had mild/moderate depression symptoms based on HAMD-17 scores (8~24). All patients were randomized into 4 groups: 1) the control group, 2) the racemic ketamine group, 3) the high-dose S-ketamine group; and 4) the low-dose S-ketamine group. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and depression was assessed using theHAMD-17 score. Serum levels of BDNF and 5-HT were measured. RESULTS The 4 groups of patients showed no significant differences in operation time, bleeding volume, hospitalization duration, or complications. The high-dose S-ketamine group showed significantly lower VAS and HAMD-17 scores than all other groups at 1 day and 3 days postoperatively, but no differences were observed in the low-dose S-ketamine group and the racemic ketamine group. The high-dose S-ketamine group showed significantly higher serum BDNF and 5-HT levels at 1 day and 3 days after surgery. However, 1 week after surgery, no difference was observed in any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS At subanesthetic dose, both 0.5 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg S-ketamine improved short-term depression and pain for cervical carcinoma patients after surgery, and the effects were better than with the same dose of racemic ketamine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12659/msm.922028

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Wang, Y., Xu, X., Peng, S., Xu, F., & Liu, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Ninth People’s Hospital of Suzhou, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland)
  • Wuxi People's Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Changzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland)
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Peirong
Venue
Medical Science Monitor
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
26
Pages
e922028-e922028
ISSN
  • 1234-1010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1643-3750
OpenAlex
W3019657248
Cited by
81
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Medical Science Monitor (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
esketamine, ketamine, depression, postoperative pain, cervical cancer, racemic ketamine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, serotonin, dose comparison, postoperative depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Carcinoma, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Ketamine, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Serotonin, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review