Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life Project

Open access
Twyford, Alex D., Beasley, Jordan, Barnes, Ian, Allen, Heather, Azzopardi, Freja, Bell, David, Blaxter, Mark L., Broad, Gavin, Campos-Dominguez, Lucia, Choonea, Darren, Crowley, Liam, Cuber, Piotr, Cunliffe, Michael, Dombrowski, Alexandra, Douglas, Brian, Forrest, Laura L., Gaya, Ester, Greeves, Clementine, Griffin, Claire, Harley, Joanna, Hart, Michelle L., Holland, Peter W.H., Hollingsworth, Peter M., Januszczak, Inez, Jones, Amanda, Kersey, Paul, Kilias, Estelle, Lawniczak, Mara K.N., Lewis, Owen T., Mian, Sahr, Minotto, Alice, Misra, Raju, Mulhair, Peter O., Pereira da Conceicoa, Lyndall, Price, Ben W., Salatino, Silvia, Shaw, Felix, Sivell, Olga, Sivess, Laura, Uhl, Rebekka, Woof, Kieran, Darwin Tree of Life Consortium·2024·Wellcome Open Research

Abstract

Biodiversity genomics research requires reliable organismal identification, which can be difficult based on morphology alone. DNA-based identification using DNA barcoding can provide confirmation of species identity and resolve taxonomic issues but is rarely used in studies generating reference genomes. Here, we describe the development and implementation of DNA barcoding for the Darwin Tree of Life Project (DToL), which aims to sequence and assemble high quality reference genomes for all eukaryotic species in Britain and Ireland. We present a standardised framework for DNA barcode sequencing and data interpretation that is then adapted for diverse organismal groups. DNA barcoding data from over 12,000 DToL specimens has identified up to 20% of samples requiring additional verification, with 2% of seed plants and 3.5% of animal specimens subsequently having their names changed. We also make recommendations for future developments using new sequencing approaches and streamlined bioinformatic approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Metadata

Authors
Twyford, A. D., Beasley, J., Barnes, I., Allen, H., Azzopardi, F., Bell, D., Blaxter, M. L., Broad, G., Campos-Dominguez, L., Choonea, D., Crowley, L., Cuber, P., Cunliffe, M., Dombrowski, A., Douglas, B., Forrest, L. L., Gaya, E., Greeves, C., Griffin, C., Harley, J., Hart, M. L., Holland, P. W. H., Hollingsworth, P. M., Januszczak, I., Jones, A., Kersey, P., Kilias, E., Lawniczak, M. K. N., Lewis, O. T., Mian, S., Minotto, A., Misra, R., Mulhair, P. O., Pereira da Conceicoa, L., Price, B. W., Salatino, S., Shaw, F., Sivell, O., Sivess, L., Uhl, R., Woof, K., & Darwin Tree of Life Consortium
Venue
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2024-06-24
Volume
9
Pages
339
ISSN
2398-502X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399939545
Cited by
801
References
26
FWCI
215.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1
The paper
Twyford, A. D., Beasley, J., Barnes, I., Allen, H., Azzopardi, F., Bell, D., Blaxter, M. L., Broad, G., Campos-Dominguez, L., Choonea, D., Crowley, L., Cuber, P., Cunliffe, M., Dombrowski, A., Douglas, B., Forrest, L. L., Gaya, E., Greeves, C., Griffin, C., . . . Darwin Tree of Life Consortium. (2024). A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Wellcome Open Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.