CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 83Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Glucosinolate Degradation Products, Isothiocyanates, Nitriles, and Thiocyanates, Induce Stomatal Closure Accompanied by Peroxidase-Mediated Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Arabidopsis thaliana

HOSSAIN, Mohammad Shakhawat, YE, Wenxiu, HOSSAIN, Mohammad Anowar, OKUMA, Eiji, URAJI, Misugi, NAKAMURA, Yoshimasa, MORI, Izumi C., MURATA, Yoshiyuki·2013·Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry
DOI 10.1271/bbb.120928
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Isothiocyanates, nitriles, and thiocyanates are degradation products of glucosinolates in crucifer plants. In this study, we investigated the stomatal response to allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), 3-butenenitrile (3BN), and ethyl thiocyanate (ESCN) in Arabidopsis. AITC, 3BN, and ESCN induced stomatal closure in the wild type and the atrbohD atrbohF mutant. Stomatal closure was inhibited by catalase and salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM). The degradation products induced extracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the rosette leaves, and intracellular ROS accumulation, NO production, and cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)]cyt) oscillations in guard cells, which were inhibited by SHAM. These results suggest that glucosinolate degradation products induce stomatal closure accompanied by extracellular ROS production mediated by SHAM-sensitive peroxidases, intracellular ROS accumulation, and [Ca(2+)]cyt oscillation in Arabidopsis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1271/bbb.120928

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aliphatic glucosinolates are involved in stomatal regulation.

    “Together with the finding that glucosinolate biosynthesis and activation mutants are less tolerant to drought (Salehin et al., 2019), and that glucosinolate breakdown products can trigger stomatal closure in Arabidopsis and Vicia faba (Khokon et al., 2011;Hossain et al., 2013), these results provide evidence that aliphatic glucosinolates are involved in stomatal regulation.”

    From Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defenses, Regulators, and Primary Metabolites: The Blurred Functional Trichotomy (2020) · cites this paper as Hossain et al., 2013

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 1) Yan X and Chen S, Planta, 226, 1343-1352 (2007). · DOI
  2. 2) Rask L, Andreasson E, Ekbom B, Eriksson S, Pontoppidan B, and Meijer J, Plant Mol. Biol., 42, 93-113 (2000). · DOI
  3. 3) Shimazaki K, Doi M, Assmann SM, and Kinoshita T, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 58, 219-247 (2007). · DOI
  4. 4) Zhao Z, Zhang W, Stanley BA, and Assmann SM, Plant Cell, 20, 3210-3226 (2008). · DOI
  5. 5) Khokon MA, Jahan MS, Rahman T, Hossain MA, Muroyama D, Minami I, Munemasa S, Mori IC, Nakamura Y, and Murata Y, Plant Cell Environ., 34, 1900-1906 (2011b). · DOI · Paper page
  6. 6) Murata Y, Pei ZM, Mori IC, and Schroeder J, Plant Cell, 13, 2513-2523 (2001). · DOI
  7. 7) Islam MM, Munemasa S, Hossain MA, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, and Murata Y, Plant Cell Physiol., 51, 302-311 (2010). · DOI
  8. 8) Bindschedler LV, Dewdney J, Blee KA, Stone JM, Asai T, Plotnikov J, Denoux C, Hayes T, Gerrish C, Davies DR, Ausubel FM, and Bolwell GP, Plant J., 47, 851-863 (2006). · DOI
  9. 9) Munemasa S, Oda K, Watanabe-Sugimoto M, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, and Murata Y, Plant Physiol., 143, 1398-1407 (2007). · DOI
  10. 10) Khokon AR, Okuma E, Hossain MA, Munemasa S, Uraji M, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, and Murata Y, Plant Cell Environ., 34, 434-443 (2011a). · DOI
  11. 11) Khokon MA, Uraji M, Munemasa S, Okuma E, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, and Murata Y, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 74, 2313-2315 (2010). · DOI
  12. 12) Khokon MA, Hossain MA, Munemasa S, Uraji M, Nakamura Y, Mori IC, and Murata Y, Plant Cell Physiol., 51, 1915-1921 (2010b). · DOI
  13. 14) Martinez C, Montillet JL, Bresson E, Agnel JP, Dai GH, Daniel JF, Geiger JP, and Nicole M, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 11, 1038-1047 (1998). · DOI
  14. 15) Kono Y and Fridovich I, J. Biol. Chem., 257, 5751-5754 (1982). · DOI
  15. 16) Correa-Aragunde N, Graziano M, and Lamattina L, Planta, 218, 900-905 (2004). · DOI
  16. 17) Nagai T, Yamada S, Tominaga T, Ichikawa M, and Miyawaki A, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 10554-10559 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  17. 18) Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, and Collinge DB, Plant J., 11, 1187-1194 (1997). · DOI
  18. 19) Doke N, Physiol. Plant Pathol., 23, 345-357 (1983). · DOI
  19. 20) Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, and Talalay P, Phytochemistry, 56, 5-51 (2001). · DOI
  20. 21) Kawano T and Muto S, J. Exp. Bot., 51, 685-693 (2000). · DOI
  21. 22) Mori IC, Pinontoan R, Kawano T, and Muto S, Plant Cell Physiol., 42, 1383-1388 (2001). · DOI
  22. 23) Ikeda-Saito M, Shelley DA, Lu L, Booth KS, Caughey WS, and Kimura S, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 3611-3616 (1991). · DOI
  23. 24) Magnani M, Serafini G, and Stocchi V, Mol. Cell. Biochem., 85, 3-7 (1989). · DOI
  24. 25) Garrido I, Espinosa F, and Alvarez-Tinaut MC, Protoplasma, 249, 1071-1080 (2012). · DOI
  25. 26) Tognolli M, Penel C, Greppin H, and Simon P, Gene, 288, 129-138 (2002). · DOI
  26. 27) Miyoshi N, Takabayashi S, Osawa T, and Nakamura Y, Carcinogenesis, 25, 567-575 (2004). · DOI
  27. 28) Galletti S, Bernardi R, Leoni O, Rollin P, and Palmieri S, J. Agric. Food Chem., 49, 471-476 (2001). · DOI
  28. 29) Hayes JD, Kelleher MO, and Eggleston IM, Eur. J. Nutr., 47, 73-88 (2008). · DOI
  29. 30) Duncan AJ and Milne JA, Br. J. Nutr., 70, 631-645 (1993). · DOI
  30. 31) Hara M, Yatsuzuka Y, Tabata K, and Kuboi T, J. Plant Physiol., 167, 643-649 (2010). · DOI
  31. 32) Brown PD and Morra MJ, Plant Soil, 181, 307-316 (1996). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
HOSSAIN, M. S., YE, W., HOSSAIN, M. A., OKUMA, E., URAJI, M., NAKAMURA, Y., MORI, I. C., & MURATA, Y.
Affiliations
Okayama University (JP)
ORCID
Venue
Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-05-23
Volume
77
Issue
5
Pages
977-983
ISSN
  • 0916-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-6947
DOI
10.1271/bbb.120928
OpenAlex
W1991981703
Cited by
83
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
glucosinolate degradation products, allyl isothiocyanate, stomatal closure, reactive oxygen species, peroxidase, salicylhydroxamic acid, nitric oxide, cytosolic calcium oscillations, guard cells, Arabidopsis thaliana, catalase
MeSH terms
Calcium, Cytosol, Glucosinolates, Peroxidase, Nitric Oxide, Nitriles, Thiocyanates, Arabidopsis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Isothiocyanates, Plant Leaves, Plant Stomata

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review