The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Almost 70% of hospitalized patients require a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV), yet up to 69% of PIVs fail prior to completion of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with PIV failure. DESIGN: A single center, prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Medical and surgical wards of a tertiary hospital located in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients requiring a PIV. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic, clinical, and potential PIV risk factors were collected. Failure occurred if the catheter had complications at removal. RESULTS: We recruited 1000 patients. Catheter failure occurred in 512 (32%) of 1578 PIVs. Occlusion/infiltration risk factors included intravenous (IV) flucloxacillin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19‐3.31), 22‐gauge PIVs (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02‐2.00), and female patients (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10‐2.00). Phlebitis was associated with female patients (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.40‐2.35), bruised insertion sites (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.26‐3.71), IV flucloxacillin (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26‐3.21), and dominant side insertion (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.77). Dislodgement risks were a paramedic insertion (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03‐3.06). Each increase by 1 in the average number of daily PIV accesses was associated (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03‐1.20)–(HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08‐1.21) with occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and dislodgement. Additional securement products were associated with less (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22‐0.46)–(HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48‐0.82) occlusion/infiltration, phlebitis and dislodgement. CONCLUSION: Modifiable risk factors should inform education and inserter skill development to reduce the currently high rate of PIV failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression
Vittinghoff, E., & McCulloch, C. E. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk052 · Cited by 4,359
The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI
Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1988) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 · Cited by 4,339
Chopra, V., Flanders, S. A., Saint, S., Woller, S. C., O'Grady, N. P., Safdar, N., Trerotola, S. O., Saran, R., Moureau, N., Wiseman, S., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-0744 · Cited by 599
Accepted but Unacceptable: Peripheral IV Catheter Failure
Helm, R. E., Klausner, J. D., Klemperer, J. D., Flint, L. M., & Huang, E. (2015) · Journal of Infusion Nursing · doi:10.1097/nan.0000000000000100 · Cited by 445
Rickard, C. M., Webster, J., Wallis, M. C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M. R., French, V., Foster, L., Gallagher, P., Gowardman, J. R., Zhang, L., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61082-4 · Cited by 428
Self-citationThe 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice
(2017) · Home Healthcare Now · doi:10.1097/nhh.0000000000000504 · Cited by 360
Wallis, M. C., McGrail, M., Webster, J., Marsh, N., Gowardman, J., Playford, E. G., & Rickard, C. M. (2014) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/674398 · Cited by 353
Self-citationClinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
Webster, J., Osborne, S., Rickard, C. M., & New, K. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007798.pub3 · Cited by 313
Self-citationPeripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem
Zingg, W., & Pittet, D. (2009) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/s0924-8579(09)70565-5 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Use of Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Worldwide
Alexandrou, E., Ray‐Barruel, G., Carr, P. J., Frost, S. A., Inwood, S., Higgins, N., Lin, F., Alberto, L., Mermel, L., Rickard, C. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12788/jhm.3039 · Cited by 430
Self-citationBest practice in the use of peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review and expert consensus
Zingg, W., Barton, A., Bitmead, J., Eggimann, P., Pujol, M., Simon, A., & Tatzel, J. (2023) · Infection Prevention in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100271 · Cited by 85
“Failure ratios of 32% and 41% were reported by Marsh [32] and Rickard [33], respectively.”
Backgroundvan Loon, F. H., Leggett, T., Bouwman, A. R., & Dierick-van Daele, A. T. (2020) · The Journal of Vascular Access · doi:10.1177/1129729820901653 · Cited by 46
Carr, P. J., Rippey, J. C. R., Cooke, M. L., Higgins, N. S., Trevenen, M., Foale, A., & Rickard, C. M. (2018) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2018.190 · Cited by 48
Self-citationSchults, J. A., Calleja, P., Slaughter, E., Paterson, R., Rickard, C. M., Booker, C., Marsh, N., Fenn, M., Kelly, J., Snelling, P. J., et al. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269788 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, N., Webster, J., Larsen, E., Cooke, M., Mihala, G., & Rickard, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-89
- ISSN
- 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-5606
- OpenAlex
- W2765339054
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 25.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12788/jhm.2867
- The paper
- Marsh, N., Webster, J., Larsen, E., Cooke, M., Mihala, G., & Rickard, C. M. (2018). Observational Study of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Outcomes in Adult Hospitalized Patients: A Multivariable Analysis of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure. Journal of Hospital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
