The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era—A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research
Abstract
Prior research has generated considerable knowledge about the design of effective IT organizational architectures. Today, however, increasing signs have accumulated that this wisdom might be inadequate in shaping appropriate insights for contemporary practice. This essay seeks to direct research attention toward the following question: How should firms organize their IT activities in order to manage the imperatives of the business and technological environments in the digital economy? We articulate the platform logic as a conceptual framework for both viewing the organizing of IT management activities as well as for framing important questions for future research. In articulating this logic, we aim to shift thinking away from the traditional focus on governance structures (i.e., choice of centralized, decentralized, or federal forms) and sourcing structures (i.e., insourcing, outsourcing) and toward more complex structures that are reflective of contemporary practice. These structures are designed around important IT capabilities and network architectures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Agarwal R., 1999, Coping with Labor Scarcity in Information Technology: Strategies and Practices for Effective Recruitment and Retention
- Barua A., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Projecting the Future through the Past
- Bharadwaj A., 1999, Proc. Twentieth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems
- Bradley S. P., 1998, Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era
- 10.2307/249521 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown C. V., 1999, Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation
- Choudhury V., 1999, Research in Strategic Management and Information Technology, 2, 55
- Christensen C. M., 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
- 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103 · DOI · Paper page
- Ciborra C. U., 1997, Steps to the Future: Fresh Thinking on the Management of IT-Based Organizational Transformation, 257
- 10.2307/249722 · DOI
- 10.2307/249721 · DOI
- D'Aveni R.A., 1994, Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering
- DiRomualdo A., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 67
- 10.2307/248998 · DOI
- 10.2307/249466 · DOI
- Feeny D. E., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 9
- Garvin D. A., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 33
- Haeckel S. H., 1999, Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-And-Respond Organizations
- 10.2307/249661 · DOI
- Keen P. G. W., 1999, Computerworld, 44
- King J., 1998, Computerworld, 32, 1
- Lacity M. C., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past
- Lawler E. E., 1996, From the Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation
- 10.2307/41165803 · DOI · Paper page
- Orlikowski W. J., 1997, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 11
- Ross J. W., 1996, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 31
- Sambamurthy V., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future through the Past
- 10.2307/249754 · DOI · Paper page
- von Simson E., 1990, Harvard Bus. Rev., 68, 158
- Venkatraman N., 1997, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 51
- Venkatraman N., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 40, 33
- Weill P., 1998, Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology
- 10.2307/249345 · DOI
- Zmud R. W., 1988, Transforming the IS Organization: The Mission, the Framework, the Transition
Cited by
Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda
Vial, G. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 · Cited by 7,337
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · Cited by 2,964
Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., R. J. (2016) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12093 · Cited by 806
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-114
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2122593986
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.