Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era—A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research

Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, Robert W.·2000·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Prior research has generated considerable knowledge about the design of effective IT organizational architectures. Today, however, increasing signs have accumulated that this wisdom might be inadequate in shaping appropriate insights for contemporary practice. This essay seeks to direct research attention toward the following question: How should firms organize their IT activities in order to manage the imperatives of the business and technological environments in the digital economy? We articulate the platform logic as a conceptual framework for both viewing the organizing of IT management activities as well as for framing important questions for future research. In articulating this logic, we aim to shift thinking away from the traditional focus on governance structures (i.e., choice of centralized, decentralized, or federal forms) and sourcing structures (i.e., insourcing, outsourcing) and toward more complex structures that are reflective of contemporary practice. These structures are designed around important IT capabilities and network architectures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.11.2.105.11780

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Agarwal R., 1999, Coping with Labor Scarcity in Information Technology: Strategies and Practices for Effective Recruitment and Retention
  2. Barua A., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Projecting the Future through the Past
  3. Bharadwaj A., 1999, Proc. Twentieth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems
  4. Bradley S. P., 1998, Sense and Respond: Capturing Value in the Network Era
  5. 10.2307/249521 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brown C. V., 1999, Repositioning the IT Organization to Enable Business Transformation
  7. Choudhury V., 1999, Research in Strategic Management and Information Technology, 2, 55
  8. Christensen C. M., 1997, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
  9. 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ciborra C. U., 1997, Steps to the Future: Fresh Thinking on the Management of IT-Based Organizational Transformation, 257
  11. 10.2307/249722 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/249721 · DOI
  13. D'Aveni R.A., 1994, Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering
  14. DiRomualdo A., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 67
  15. 10.2307/248998 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/249466 · DOI
  17. Feeny D. E., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 9
  18. Garvin D. A., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 39, 33
  19. Haeckel S. H., 1999, Adaptive Enterprise: Creating and Leading Sense-And-Respond Organizations
  20. 10.2307/249661 · DOI
  21. Keen P. G. W., 1999, Computerworld, 44
  22. King J., 1998, Computerworld, 32, 1
  23. Lacity M. C., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past
  24. Lawler E. E., 1996, From the Ground Up: Six Principles for Building the New Logic Corporation
  25. 10.2307/41165803 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Orlikowski W. J., 1997, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 11
  27. Ross J. W., 1996, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 31
  28. Sambamurthy V., 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future through the Past
  29. 10.2307/249754 · DOI · Paper page
  30. von Simson E., 1990, Harvard Bus. Rev., 68, 158
  31. Venkatraman N., 1997, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 51
  32. Venkatraman N., 1998, Sloan Management Rev., 40, 33
  33. Weill P., 1998, Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology
  34. 10.2307/249345 · DOI
  35. Zmud R. W., 1988, Transforming the IS Organization: The Mission, the Framework, the Transition

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W.
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2000-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
105-114
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2122593986
Cited by
383
References
1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.