The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context
Abstract
We identify two post-acceptance information system (IS) usage behaviors related to how employees leverage implemented systems. Routine use (RTN) refers to employees' using IS in a routine and standardized manner to support their work, and innovative use (INV) describes employees' discovering new ways to use IS to support their work. We use motivation theory as the overarching perspective to explain RTN and INV and appropriate the rich intrinsic motivation (RIM) concept from social psychology to propose a conceptualization of RIM toward IS use, which includes intrinsic motivation toward accomplishment (IMap), intrinsic motivation to know (IMkw), and intrinsic motivation to experience stimulation (IMst). We also consider the influence of perceived usefulness (PU)—a representative surrogate construct of extrinsic motivation toward IS use—on RTN and INV. We theorize the relative impacts of the RIM constructs and PU on RTN and INV and the role of personal innovativeness with IT (PIIT) in moderating the RIM constructs' influences on INV. Based on data from 193 employees using a business intelligence system at one of the largest telecom service companies in China, we found (1) PU had a stronger impact on RTN than the RIM constructs, (2) IMkw and IMst each had a stronger impact on INV than either PU or IMap, and (3) PIIT positively moderated the impact of each RIM construct on INV. Our findings provide insights on managing RTN and INV in the post-acceptance stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,654
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Agarwal R, 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past, 85
- 10.2307/3172591 · doi:10.2307/3172591 · Paper page
- Benner MJ, 2003, Acad. Management J., 28, 238
- 10.4018/joeuc.2005100101 · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2005100101
- Brislin RW, 1973, Cross-Culture Research Method
- Brophy J, 1987, Advances in Motivation and Achievements, 5, 181
- Chin W, 1998, MIS Quart., 22, vii
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
- Gefen D, 2005, Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems, 16, 91
- 10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 · Paper page
- Hsieh J, 2006, DIGIT 2006 Proc. Paper 3
- Kim DH, 1993, Sloan Management Rev., 35, 37
- Luthans F, 1985, Organizational Behavior Modification and Beyond
- McGraw KO, 1978, The Hidden Costs of Reward, 255
- 10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9
- Nunnally JC, 1994, Psychometric Theory
- Rogers EM, 2003, Diffusion of Innovation
- Saga VL, 1994, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, 67
- 10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.173 · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.173 · Paper page
- 10.2307/30040662 · doi:10.2307/30040662 · Paper page
- Sun H, 2008, Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems
- Thomas KW, 1990, Acad. Management Rev., 15, 666
- Wang W, 2006, ICIS 2006 Proc. Paper 48
Cited by
Extending the understanding of mobile banking adoption: When UTAUT meets TTF and ITM
Oliveira, T., Faria, M., Thomas, M. A., & Popovič, A. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.06.004 · Cited by 808
Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems1
Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.01 · Cited by 521
Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus
Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.001 · Cited by 331
How does artificial intelligence create business agility? Evidence from chatbots
Wang, X., Lin, X., & Shao, B. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102535 · Cited by 197
Motivating Employees to Explore Collaboration Technology in Team Contexts1
Maruping, L. M., & Magni, M. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.01 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., & Rai, A.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 659-682
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2021557505
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 166
- FWCI
- 31.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
- The paper
- Li, X., Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.