Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context

Li, Xixi, Hsieh, J. J. Po-An, Rai, Arun·2013·Information Systems Research

Abstract

We identify two post-acceptance information system (IS) usage behaviors related to how employees leverage implemented systems. Routine use (RTN) refers to employees' using IS in a routine and standardized manner to support their work, and innovative use (INV) describes employees' discovering new ways to use IS to support their work. We use motivation theory as the overarching perspective to explain RTN and INV and appropriate the rich intrinsic motivation (RIM) concept from social psychology to propose a conceptualization of RIM toward IS use, which includes intrinsic motivation toward accomplishment (IMap), intrinsic motivation to know (IMkw), and intrinsic motivation to experience stimulation (IMst). We also consider the influence of perceived usefulness (PU)—a representative surrogate construct of extrinsic motivation toward IS use—on RTN and INV. We theorize the relative impacts of the RIM constructs and PU on RTN and INV and the role of personal innovativeness with IT (PIIT) in moderating the RIM constructs' influences on INV. Based on data from 193 employees using a business intelligence system at one of the largest telecom service companies in China, we found (1) PU had a stronger impact on RTN than the RIM constructs, (2) IMkw and IMst each had a stronger impact on INV than either PU or IMap, and (3) PIIT positively moderated the impact of each RIM construct on INV. Our findings provide insights on managing RTN and INV in the post-acceptance stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1120.0456

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 166 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Agarwal R, 2000, Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future…Through the Past, 85
  2. 10.2307/3172591 · doi:10.2307/3172591 · Paper page
  3. Benner MJ, 2003, Acad. Management J., 28, 238
  4. 10.4018/joeuc.2005100101 · doi:10.4018/joeuc.2005100101
  5. Brislin RW, 1973, Cross-Culture Research Method
  6. Brophy J, 1987, Advances in Motivation and Achievements, 5, 181
  7. Chin W, 1998, MIS Quart., 22, vii
  8. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gefen D, 2005, Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems, 16, 91
  11. 10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 · Paper page
  12. Hsieh J, 2006, DIGIT 2006 Proc. Paper 3
  13. Kim DH, 1993, Sloan Management Rev., 35, 37
  14. Luthans F, 1985, Organizational Behavior Modification and Beyond
  15. McGraw KO, 1978, The Hidden Costs of Reward, 255
  16. 10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9
  17. Nunnally JC, 1994, Psychometric Theory
  18. Rogers EM, 2003, Diffusion of Innovation
  19. Saga VL, 1994, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, 67
  20. 10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.173 · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.173 · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/30040662 · doi:10.2307/30040662 · Paper page
  22. Sun H, 2008, Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems
  23. Thomas KW, 1990, Acad. Management Rev., 15, 666
  24. Wang W, 2006, ICIS 2006 Proc. Paper 48

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., & Rai, A.
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2013-09
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
659-682
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2021557505
Cited by
314
References
166
FWCI
31.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1120.0456
The paper
Li, X., Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., & Rai, A. (2013). Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.