CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 326Information Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment

Ba, Sulin, Stallaert, Jan, Whinston, Andrew B.·2001·Information Systems Research
DOI 10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Prior research has generated considerable knowledge on information systems design from software engineering and user-acceptance perspectives. As organizational processes are increasingly embedded within information systems, one of the key considerations of many business processes—organizational incentives—should become an important dimension of any information systems design and evaluation, which we categorize as the third dimension: incentive alignment. Incentive issues have become important in many IS areas, including distributed decision support systems (DSS), knowledge management, and e-business supply chain coordination. In this paper we outline why incentives are important in each of these areas and specify requirements for designing incentive-aligned information systems. We identify and define important unresolved problems along the incentive-alignment dimension of information systems and present a research agenda to address them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bayers C., 2000, Wired, 8, 210
  2. Buxton J. N., 1969, Rep. Conf.
  3. Deckmyn D., 2000, Computerworld
  4. Hansen M., 1999, Harvard Bus. Rev., 106
  5. Mas-Colell A., 1995, Microeconomic Theory
  6. Naur P., Randell B. Software engineering. (1968) . Rep. Conf.(sponsored by the NATO Science Committee) Garmisch, Germany, and 1969. Scientific Affairs Division, NATO Brussels, Belgium
  7. Orlikowski W., 1997, Sloan Management Rev., 38, 11
  8. Palfrey T., 1997, Amer. Econom. Rev., 87, 829
  9. Radner R., 1986, Econom. J., 96, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 326

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
ORCID
Ba, Sulin
Venue
Information Systems Research
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published
2001-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
225-239
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
DOI
10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712
OpenAlex
W2072633088
Cited by
326
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
incentive alignment, information system design, organizational incentives, distributed decision support systems, knowledge management, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review