Cited by 94Usability and User Interface DesignSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Human-centered design of a distributed knowledge management system

Open access
Rinkus, Susan, Walji, Muhammad, Johnson-Throop, Kathy A., Malin, Jane T., Turley, James P., Smith, Jack W., Zhang, Jiajie·2005·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Many healthcare technology projects fail due to the lack of consideration of human issues, such as workflow, organizational change, and usability, during the design and implementation stages of a project's development process. Even when human issues are considered, the consideration is typically on designing better user interfaces. We argue that human-centered computing goes beyond a better user interface: it should include considerations of users, functions and tasks that are fundamental to human-centered computing. From this perspective, we integrated a previously developed human-centered methodology with a Project Design Lifecycle, and we applied this integration in the design of a complex distributed knowledge management system for the Biomedical Engineer (BME) domain in the Mission Control Center at NASA Johnson Space Center. We analyzed this complex system, identified its problems, generated systems requirements, and provided specifications of a replacement prototype for effective organizational memory and knowledge management. We demonstrated the value provided by our human-centered approach and described the unique properties, structures, and processes discovered using this methodology and how they contributed in the design of the prototype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.014

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on clinical information systems repeatedly finds that CPOE integration fundamentally alters how clinicians coordinate and collaborate in care delivery.

    “one theme consistently emerges: embedding CPOE in healthcare fundamentally changes the way clinicians coordinate their work activities and collaborate to deliver care.[18][19][20][21]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Slomon G. Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations (Learning in doing-social, cognitive, and compu- tational perspectives.). New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
  2. Ackerman MS, Halverson C. Considering an organizationÕs memory. In: Proceedings of Computer-Supported Coorperative Work, 1998; 1998.
  3. Ackerman MS, Halverson, CA. Considering an organizationÕs memory. In: Proceedings of the ACM 1998 conference on computer supported cooperative work; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rinkus, S., Walji, M., Johnson-Throop, K. A., Malin, J. T., Turley, J. P., Smith, J. W., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jiajie
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
4-17
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048338875
Cited by
94
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NCC21234)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (5T15-LM-07093, T15LM007093)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
human-centered design, human-centered computing, institutional memory, health technology, biomedical engineering, usability, organizational change, workflow
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Communication Networks, Database Management Systems, Ergonomics, Software Design, United States, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review