Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses
Abstract
Top management support is a key recurrent factor critical for effective information systems (IS) implementation. However, the role of top management support may not be as critical as external IS expertise, in the form of consultants and vendors, in small business IS implementation due to the unique characteristics of small businesses. This paper describes an empirical study of the relative importance of top management support and external IS expertise on IS effectiveness in 114 small businesses. Partial least squares (PLS) was used for statistical testing. The results show that top management support is not as important as effective external IS expertise in small business IS implementation. While top management support is essential for IS effectiveness, high quality external IS expertise is even more critical for small businesses operating in an environment of resource poverty. These findings call for more research efforts to be directed at selecting and engaging high quality external IS expertise for IS implementation in small businesses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) initiation.
“Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Thong, 1996
HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) routinisation.
“Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Thong, 1996
HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) extension.
“Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Thong, 1996
HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) adoption.
“Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Thong, 1996
Cites
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses
Thong, J. Y. L. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227 · Cited by 1,727 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework
Nguyen, T. H., Newby, M., & Macaulay, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12058 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences
Prikshat, V., Malik, A., & Budhwar, P. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100860 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Multiple Conceptualizations of Small Business Web Use and Benefit*
Pflughoeft, K. A., Ramamurthy, K., Soofi, E. S., Yasai‐Ardekani, M., & Zahedi, F. (. (2003) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02539.x · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Sandeep, M. M., & Lavanya, V. (2026) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-03-2024-0082 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
E-Procurement Adoption in Indonesian Government: A Study of Toe Model
Ardy Susantya, S., Aswar, K., Sumardjo, M., Panjaitan, I., & Andreas, A. (2022) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.18(3).2022.09 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thong, J. Y. L., Yap, C.-S., & Raman, K. S.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-267
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2067311739
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- top management support, information system implementation, small business, consultants, resource constraints, information systems adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review