Cited by 655ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses

Thong, James Y. L., Yap, Chee-Sing, Raman, K. S.·1996·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Top management support is a key recurrent factor critical for effective information systems (IS) implementation. However, the role of top management support may not be as critical as external IS expertise, in the form of consultants and vendors, in small business IS implementation due to the unique characteristics of small businesses. This paper describes an empirical study of the relative importance of top management support and external IS expertise on IS effectiveness in 114 small businesses. Partial least squares (PLS) was used for statistical testing. The results show that top management support is not as important as effective external IS expertise in small business IS implementation. While top management support is essential for IS effectiveness, high quality external IS expertise is even more critical for small businesses operating in an environment of resource poverty. These findings call for more research efforts to be directed at selecting and engaging high quality external IS expertise for IS implementation in small businesses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.7.2.248

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) initiation.

    “Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
  • HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) routinisation.

    “Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
  • HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) extension.

    “Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”
  • HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) adoption.

    “Research Proposition 7 (a-d): HR staff's ICT skills will be positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation and d) extension.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thong, J. Y. L., Yap, C.-S., & Raman, K. S.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
1996-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
248-267
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2067311739
Cited by
655
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 36
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
top management support, information system implementation, small business, consultants, resource constraints, information systems adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review