Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective

Oh, Wonseok, Jeon, Sangyong·2007·Management Science

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to conceptually understand membership dynamics in the open source software (OSS) community, and (2) to explore how different network characteristics (i.e., network size and connectivity) influence the stability of an OSS network. Through the lens of Ising theory, which is widely accepted in physics, we investigate basic patterns of interaction and present fresh conceptual insight into dynamic and reciprocal relations among OSS community members. We also perform computer simulations based on empirical data collected from two actual OSS communities. Key findings include: (1) membership herding is highly present when external influences (e.g., the availability of other OSS projects) are weak, but decreases significantly when external influences increase, (2) propensity for membership herding is most likely to be seen in a large network with random connectivity, and (3) for large networks, when external influences are weak, random connectivity will result in higher network strength than scale-free connectivity (as external influences increase, however, the reverse phenomenon is observed). In addition, scale-free connectivity appears to be less volatile than random connectivity in response to an increase in the strength of external influences. We conclude with several implications that may be of significance to OSS stakeholders in particular, and to a broader range of online communities in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0623

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1287/orsc.10.6.741 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00740-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2307/2118364 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1257/jep.12.3.151 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis
  7. Brown J., 2002, The Social Life of Information
  8. 10.2307/2393923 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/2096108 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00003-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00073-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2307/2392145 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Erdős P., 1960, Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci., 5, 17
  17. 10.1109/SFFCS.1999.814624 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/0022-1082.00103 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.025101 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1287/mnsc.14.10.B601 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.10.b601
  21. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1142/9789812811578_0005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1287/isre.1040.0023 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/BF02179581 · DOI
  25. Lawrence P. R., 1967, Organization and Environment
  26. 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00220-0 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lerner J., 2002, J. Indust. Econom., 2, 197, 10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1142/S0129183103004747 · DOI
  29. 10.4135/9781483325385.n9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Markus L., 2000, Sloan Management Rev., 42, 13
  31. Michlmayr M., 2004, Proc. 2004 USENIX Annual Tech. Conf., Freenix Track, 93
  32. 10.5465/amr.1987.4306502 · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306502 · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9 · DOI · Paper page
  34. O’Mahony S., Ferraro F. Managing the boundary of an “open” project. (2004) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 03-60, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, http://ssrn.com/abstract=474782 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1086/421508 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Scharfstein D., 1990, Amer. Econom. Rev., 80, 465
  38. 10.1257/jep.4.2.19 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/2393808 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Vaughan-Nichols S. J., 2005, eWeek
  41. Winter D. G., 1973, The Power Motive

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Oh, W., & Jeon, S.
Venue
Management Science
Published
2007-07
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1086-1101
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W2034008825
Cited by
164
References
6
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0623
The paper
Oh, W., & Jeon, S. (2007). Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0623

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.