The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to conceptually understand membership dynamics in the open source software (OSS) community, and (2) to explore how different network characteristics (i.e., network size and connectivity) influence the stability of an OSS network. Through the lens of Ising theory, which is widely accepted in physics, we investigate basic patterns of interaction and present fresh conceptual insight into dynamic and reciprocal relations among OSS community members. We also perform computer simulations based on empirical data collected from two actual OSS communities. Key findings include: (1) membership herding is highly present when external influences (e.g., the availability of other OSS projects) are weak, but decreases significantly when external influences increase, (2) propensity for membership herding is most likely to be seen in a large network with random connectivity, and (3) for large networks, when external influences are weak, random connectivity will result in higher network strength than scale-free connectivity (as external influences increase, however, the reverse phenomenon is observed). In addition, scale-free connectivity appears to be less volatile than random connectivity in response to an increase in the strength of external influences. We conclude with several implications that may be of significance to OSS stakeholders in particular, and to a broader range of online communities in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus
Ising, E. (1925) · Zeitschrift für Physik · doi:10.1007/bf02980577 · Cited by 3,871
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025
How motives, skills, and values determine what people do.
McClelland, D. C. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.7.812 · Cited by 965
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00740-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2118364 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/jep.12.3.151 · DOI · Paper page
- Borgatti S. P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis
- Brown J., 2002, The Social Life of Information
- 10.2307/2393923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2096108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00003-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00073-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392145 · DOI · Paper page
- Erdős P., 1960, Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci., 5, 17
- 10.1109/SFFCS.1999.814624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0022-1082.00103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.025101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.14.10.B601 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.10.b601
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/9789812811578_0005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1040.0023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02179581 · DOI
- Lawrence P. R., 1967, Organization and Environment
- 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00220-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Lerner J., 2002, J. Indust. Econom., 2, 197, 10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0129183103004747 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781483325385.n9 · DOI · Paper page
- Markus L., 2000, Sloan Management Rev., 42, 13
- Michlmayr M., 2004, Proc. 2004 USENIX Annual Tech. Conf., Freenix Track, 93
- 10.5465/amr.1987.4306502 · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306502 · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9 · DOI · Paper page
- O’Mahony S., Ferraro F. Managing the boundary of an “open” project. (2004) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 03-60, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, http://ssrn.com/abstract=474782 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/421508 · DOI · Paper page
- Scharfstein D., 1990, Amer. Econom. Rev., 80, 465
- 10.1257/jep.4.2.19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2393808 · DOI · Paper page
- Vaughan-Nichols S. J., 2005, eWeek
- Winter D. G., 1973, The Power Motive
Cited by
von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001 · Cited by 300
Folding and Unfolding: Balancing Openness and Transparency in Open Source Communities
Shaikh, M., & Vaast, E. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0646 · Cited by 78
The Impact of Ideology Misfit on Open Source Software Communities and Companies1
Daniel, S. L., Maruping, L. M., Cataldo, M., & Herbsleb, J. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14242 · Cited by 58
Reputation in an open source software community: Antecedents and impacts
Cai, Y., & Zhu, D. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.08.004 · Cited by 43
Zhang, X., Xu, T., Wei, X., Tang, J., & Ordonez de Pablos, P. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0791 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, W., & Jeon, S.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1086-1101
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2034008825
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0623
- The paper
- Oh, W., & Jeon, S. (2007). Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.