The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias
Open accessAbstract
People are more willing to bet on their own judgments when they feel skillful or knowledgeable. We investigate whether this “competence effect” influences trading frequency and home bias. We find that investors who feel competent trade more often and have more internationally diversified portfolios. We also find that male investors, and investors with larger portfolios or more education, are more likely to perceive themselves as competent than are female investors, and investors with smaller portfolios or less education. Our paper also contributes to understanding the theoretical link between overconfidence and trading frequency. Existing theories on trading frequency have focused on one aspect of overconfidence, i.e., miscalibration. Our paper offers a potential mechanism for the “better-than-average” aspect of overconfidence to influence trading frequency. In the context of our paper, overconfident investors tend to perceive themselves to be more competent, and thus are more willing to act on their beliefs, leading to higher trading frequency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955
Odean, T. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.5.1279 · Cited by 2,247
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122575 · Cited by 1,795
Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty
Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00057884 · Cited by 1,654
Fear of the Unknown: Familiarity and Economic Decisions
Cao, H. H., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D., & Zhang, H. H. (2011) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfp023 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
RIEDL, A., & SMEETS, P. (2017) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12547 · Cited by 1,378
Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Economic Outcomes
Hastings, J. S., Madrian, B. C., & Skimmyhorn, W. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082312-125807 · Cited by 1,041
Sensation Seeking, Overconfidence, and Trading Activity
GRINBLATT, M., & KELOHARJU, M. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01443.x · Cited by 819
The Behavior of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2013) · Handbook of the Economics of Finance · doi:10.1016/b978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6 · Cited by 750
Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market
Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2016) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Huang, H.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1094-1106
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2889881145
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1009
- The paper
- Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Huang, H. (2009). Investor Competence, Trading Frequency, and Home Bias. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.