Cited by 1,378Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Finance and Green Bonds

Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?

Open access
RIEDL, ARNO, SMEETS, PAUL·2017·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

To understand why investors hold socially responsible mutual funds, we link administrative data to survey responses and behavior in incentivized experiments. We find that both social preferences and social signaling explain socially responsible investment (SRI) decisions. Financial motives play less of a role. Socially responsible investors in our sample expect to earn lower returns on SRI funds than on conventional funds and pay higher management fees. This suggests that investors are willing to forgo financial performance in order to invest in accordance with their social preferences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jofi.12547

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retail SRI demand is often driven by pro-social preferences rather than explicit public commitments to ESG often made by institutional investors.

    “First, retail SRI demand is often driven by pro-social preferences (see Riedl and Smeets (2017)), rather than explicit public commitments to ESG often made by institutional investors.”

    From Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Riedl and Smeets (2017)

  • Institutional investors are less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns compared to retail investors.

    “All of this makes institutions less likely to turn away from sustainable investments during market turbulence and economic downturns, compared to retail investors.”

    From Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as Riedl and Smeets (2017)

    The Discussion and Conclusion examines why individuals hold socially responsible equity funds; the regression results link their holdings to expected returns and investment horizons. Searches for institutional-versus-retail behavior during market turbulence or economic downturns found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RIEDL, A., & SMEETS, P.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
2505-2550
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2754962058
Cited by
1,378
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 201 · 2025: 221 · 2024: 251 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
77.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Veni.175.019, 016.Veni, 451-16-005)
  • University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Keywords
socially responsible investment, socially responsible mutual funds, social preferences, social signaling, investor behavior, mutual fund returns, management fees, financial motives, behavioral finance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review