Cited by 1,654Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesRisk Perception and Management

Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty

Heath, Chip, Tversky, Amos·1991·Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00057884

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heath, C., & Tversky, A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Published
1991-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
5-28
ISSN
  • 0895-5646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0476
OpenAlex
W2017211257
Cited by
1,654
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 81
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
ambiguity aversion, decision making under uncertainty, belief attribution, self-assessment of knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review