Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences among individuals' tolerances for uncertainty play an important role.
“Of course, differences among individuals' tolerances for uncertainty also play an important role [45,85,102,114].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524 · see citing works
Self-citation“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467 · see citing works
Self-citationAlgorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232 · see citing works
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Self-citationNarcissism, confidence, and risk attitude
Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.475 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Bhatt, U., Antorán, J., Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., Sattigeri, P., Fogliato, R., Melançon, G., Krishnan, R., Stanley, J., Tickoo, O., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3461702.3462571 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Fear of the Unknown: Familiarity and Economic Decisions
Cao, H. H., Han, B., Hirshleifer, D., & Zhang, H. H. (2011) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfp023 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Zhou, K. Z., & Nakamoto, K. (2007) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-006-0011-3 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Known Unknowns: A Critical Determinant of Confidence and Calibration
Walters, D. J., Fernbach, P. M., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2580 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Donohoe, D., & Costello, E. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i17.15041 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Children’s reasoning about possible outcomes of events in the present and the future
Küçük, E. N., & Kibbe, M. M. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vudfm · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heath, C., & Tversky, A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-28
- ISSN
- 0895-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2017211257
- Cited by
- 1,654
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 81
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- ambiguity aversion, decision making under uncertainty, belief attribution, self-assessment of knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review