The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Extroverted Firm: How External Information Practices Affect Innovation and Productivity
Abstract
We gather detailed data on organizational practices and information technology (IT) use at 253 firms to examine the hypothesis that external focus—the ability of a firm to detect and therefore respond to changes in its external operating environment—increases returns to IT, especially when combined with decentralized decision making. First, using survey-based measures, we find that external focus is correlated with both organizational decentralization, and IT investment. Second, we find that a cluster of practices including external focus, decentralization, and IT is associated with improved product innovation capabilities. Third, we develop and test a three-way complementarities model that indicates that the combination of external focus, decentralization, and IT is associated with significantly higher productivity in our sample. We also introduce a new set of instrumental variables representing barriers to IT-related organizational change and find that our results are robust when we account for the potential endogeneity of organizational investments. Our results may help explain why firms that operate in information-rich environments such as high-technology clusters or areas with high worker mobility have experienced especially high returns to IT investment and suggest a set of practices that some managers may be able to use to increase their returns from IT investments. This paper was accepted by Sandra Slaughter, information systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164 · cited 2×
“Executives devote a significant part of their time to recruiting.”
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Self-citationAmericans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. V. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.167 · Cited by 1,028
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994
Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, L. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460 · Cited by 365
Self-citationTechnical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers
Bresnahan, T., Greenstein, S., Brownstone, D., & Flamm, K. (1996) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics · doi:10.2307/2534746 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171452 · Cited by 2,744
The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021) · American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20180386 · Cited by 1,003
Self-citationSchryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Data Analytics, Innovation, and Firm Productivity
Wu, L., Hitt, L., & Lou, B. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281 · Cited by 368
Self-citationThree-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology
Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E., & Wu, L. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460 · Cited by 365
Self-citationInformation Technology Impacts on Firm Performance: An Extension of Kohli and 1
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.4 · Cited by 200
Ben-Assuli, O. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.014 · Cited by 175
When does AI pay off? AI-adoption intensity, complementary investments, and R&D strategy
Lee, Y. S., Kim, T., Choi, S., & Kim, W. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102590 · Cited by 141
Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13490 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Tambe, P., Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 843-859
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2098551118
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 39.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.