The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off
Abstract
This paper deals with a basic issue: How does one approach the problem of designing the “right” objective for a given resource allocation problem? The notion of what is right can be fairly nebulous; we consider two issues that we see as key: efficiency and fairness. We approach the problem of designing objectives that account for the natural tension between efficiency and fairness in the context of a framework that captures a number of resource allocation problems of interest to managers. More precisely, we consider a rich family of objectives that have been well studied in the literature for their fairness properties. We deal with the problem of selecting the appropriate objective from this family. We characterize the trade-off achieved between efficiency and fairness as one selects different objectives and develop several concrete managerial prescriptions for the selection problem based on this trade-off. Finally, we demonstrate the value of our framework in a case study that considers air traffic management. This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Nash, J. F. (1950) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907266 · Cited by 7,840
Bertsekas, D. P., & Gallager, R. G. (1987) · Cited by 5,561
Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability
Kelly, F. P., Maulloo, A. K., & Tan, D. K. H. (1998) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600523 · Cited by 5,021
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1964) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913738 · Cited by 4,874
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1976) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912743 · Cited by 4,654
Foundations of Economic Analysis.
Stigler, G. J., & Samuelson, P. A. (1948) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280713 · Cited by 4,128
On the measurement of inequality
Atkinson, A. B. (1970) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6 · Cited by 3,945
Sen, A., & Foster, J. (1973) · doi:10.1093/0198281935.001.0001 · Cited by 3,429
Foundations of Economic Analysis
Ruist, E., & Samuelson, P. A. (1948) · Ekonomisk Tidskrift · doi:10.2307/3438190 · Cited by 2,965
Cited by
Impossible decision? An investigation of risk trade-offs in the intensive care unit
Reader, T. W., Reddy, G., & Brett, S. J. (2018) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1301573 · Cited by 36
Predictive and prescriptive analytics toward passenger-centric ground delay programs
Jacquillat, A. (2022) · Transportation Science · doi:10.1287/trsc.2021.1081 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertsimas, D., Farias, V. F., & Trichakis, N.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2234-2250
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2150341114
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1549
- The paper
- Bertsimas, D., Farias, V. F., & Trichakis, N. (2012). On the Efficiency-Fairness Trade-off. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.