Cited by 347Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorAging and Gerontology Research

Old Age and the Decline in Financial Literacy

Finke, Michael S., Howe, John S., Huston, Sandra J.·2017·Management Science

Abstract

Households age 60 and older bear increasing responsibility for managing retirement portfolios, and they hold the majority of financial assets in the United States. Cognitive aging studies find evidence of a decline in fluid and crystallized intelligence in old age that may impact the ability to manage money effectively. Using a large sample of older respondents, we test whether knowledge of basic concepts essential to effective financial choice declines after age 60. We find a consistent linear decline in financial literacy score after age 60. A nearly identical rate of decline among men, stockowners, older, and college-educated respondents indicates that cohort effects are not driving the results. Confidence in financial decision-making abilities does not decline with age. A separate analysis using data that include measures of cognitive ability suggests that a natural decline in both fluid and crystallized intelligence in old age contributes to falling financial literacy scores. This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, finance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2293

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Financial literacy scores decline by about 1% a year for people older than 60.

    “Finke et al. (2016) find that financial literacy scores decline by about 1% a year for people older than 60.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Finke et al. 2016

  • Confidence in financial abilities does not decline with age, making the elderly particularly vulnerable to financial scams and fraud.

    “Gamble et al. (2015) and Finke et al. (2016) show that confidence in financial abilities does not decline with age, making the elderly particularly vulnerable to financial scams and fraud (Deevy et al. 2012).”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Finke et al. (2016)

  • Individuals aged 60 and older hold about 50% of the wealth in the U.S.

    “individuals aged 60 and older hold about 50% of the wealth in the U.S. (Finke et al. 2016).”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Finke et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finke, M. S., Howe, J. S., & Huston, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Finke, Michael S.
Venue
Management Science
Published
2017-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
213-230
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W3125959528
Cited by
347
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
130.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Texas Tech University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
financial literacy, cognitive aging, older adults, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, cohort effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review