Cited by 842Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFinancial Literacy and Behavior

How Am I Doing? Perceived Financial Well-Being, Its Potential Antecedents, and Its Relation to Overall Well-Being

Open access
Netemeyer, Richard G, Warmath, Dee, Fernandes, Daniel, Lynch, John G·2018·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Though perceived financial well-being is viewed as an important topic of consumer research, the literature contains no accepted definition of this construct. Further, there has been little systematic examination of how perceived financial well-being may affect overall well-being. Using consumer financial narratives, several large-scale surveys, and two experiments, we conceptualize perceived financial well-being as two related but separate constructs: 1) stress related to the management of money today (current money management stress), and 2) a sense of security in one’s financial future (expected future financial security). We develop and validate measures of these constructs (web appendix A) and then demonstrate their relationship to overall well-being, controlling for other life domains and objective measures of the financial domain. Our findings demonstrate that perceived financial well-being is a key predictor of overall well-being and comparable in magnitude to the combined effect of other life domains (job satisfaction, physical health assessment, and relationship support satisfaction). Further, the relative importance of current money management stress to overall well-being varies by income groups and due to the differing antecedents of current money management stress and expected future financial security. Implications for financial well-being and education efforts are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcr/ucx109

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Netemeyer, R. G., Warmath, D., Fernandes, D., & Lynch, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Netemeyer, Richard G
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2017-11-07
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
68-89
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2767423872
Cited by
842
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
88.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
Keywords
well-being, income gap, life satisfaction, financial education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review