The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Theory of ICOs: Diversification, Agency, and Information Asymmetry
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a theory of financing of entrepreneurial ventures via crypto tokens, which is not limited to platform-based ventures. We compare token financing with traditional equity financing, focusing on agency problems and information asymmetry frictions associated with the two financing methods, as well as on risk sharing between entrepreneurs and investors. Token financing introduces an agency problem not present under equity financing (underproduction), while mitigating an agency problem often associated with equity financing (entrepreneurial effort underprovision). Our theory abstracts from all institutional and potentially transient differences between tokens and equity and is based on a single intrinsic characteristic of tokens: they represent claims to a venture’s output. We show that tokens are likely to dominate equity for ventures developing goods or services that involve low marginal production costs, those for which entrepreneurial effort is crucial, and/or those with relatively low payoff volatility. In addition, tokens can have an advantage over equity in signaling venture quality to outside investors. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Spence, M. (1973) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882010 · Cited by 16,171
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Myers, S. C. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0 · Cited by 13,169
N. Berger, A., & F. Udell, G. (1998) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00038-7 · Cited by 3,690
Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria
Cho, I.-K., & Kreps, D. M. (1987) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885060 · Cited by 3,201
Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P. (2003) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00245 · Cited by 1,533
Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices
Innes, R. D. (1990) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(90)90066-s · Cited by 923
A Liquidity-based Model of Security Design
Demarzo, P., & Duffie, D. (1999) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00004 · Cited by 737
Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings
Adhami, S., Giudici, G., & Martinazzi, S. (2018) · Journal of Economics and Business · doi:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.04.001 · Cited by 557
Kaplan, S. N., & Str�mberg, P. J. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.218175 · Cited by 516
Cited by
Decentralization through tokenization
SOCKIN, M., & XIONG, W. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13192 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Chod, J., & Lyandres, E.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5969-5989
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3123844866
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 39.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of ICOs: Diversification, Agency, and Information Asymmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3754
- The paper
- Chod, J., & Lyandres, E. (2021). A Theory of ICOs: Diversification, Agency, and Information Asymmetry. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.