The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-Citation Analysis
Abstract
Researchers in all academic disciplines benefit from an understanding of the intellectual development of their field. This understanding is essential for conducting studies which build systematically on prior research. The purpose of this study is to document the intellectual development of the ideas represented by published research in Management Information Systems (MIS) based on an author co-citation analysis. The resulting mapping is intended to serve as a benchmark for future assessments of MIS as a field as well as a means for documenting the emergence of new research specialties. The study sought to identify (1) the subfields which constitute MIS research, (2) the reference disciplines of these subfields, (3) the diffusion of the ideas represented by these subfields to other disciplines, and (4) which of these subfields represent active areas of current MIS research. Nine invisible colleges, or informal clusters of research were uncovered. These nine empirically defined conceptual groupings collectively define the intellectual foundations of MIS as well as the forces currently shaping MIS research. Four of the clusters represent early MIS research themes which are still popular, based on subsequent citation patterns. Despite the centrality of the concept of the organization to widely-accepted definitions of MIS, the results suggest that MIS research is not well-grounded in organization theory nor have MIS research results been widely diffused in the organizational literature. Suggestions for developing a better link between MIS and organizational theory are presented based on the concept of organizational effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 · Cited by 3,329
Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics
Pritchard, A. E. (1969) · Journal of Documentation · Cited by 3,298
Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis
Anthony, R. N. (1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,226
Decision support systems : an organizational perspective
Keen, P., & Morton, M. S. S. (1978) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 1,673
A framework for management information systems
Gorry, G. A., & Morton, M. S. S. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1,464
Churchman, C. W. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,351
Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development
Davis, G. B. (1985) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,322
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Cited by
Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · Cited by 3,349
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1993) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1993.11518001 · Cited by 1,288
Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis
Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.012 · Cited by 546
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Culnan, M. J.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1986-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-172
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2106467926
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 37.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-Citation Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.156
- The paper
- Culnan, M. J. (1986). The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-Citation Analysis. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.2.156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.