The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test
Abstract
This paper reports on the culmination of a four year study of high technology product innovation. During the course of this research, we examined over 330 new products in the electronics industry in order to better understand the factors that differentiated successful from unsuccessful product development efforts. This paper presents the conclusions from the final phase of the research. In this study we empirically test a model of product development that incorporates our findings from the earlier exploratory survey and case study phases of our research. The model identifies the critical organizational subunits, development activities and communication channels that influence product outcome, as well as, external factors such as characteristics of the product and the competitive environment. Our findings suggest the following key factors affect product outcome: (1) the quality of the R&D organization, (2) the technical performance of the product, (3) the product's value to the customer, (4) the synergy of the new product with the firm's existing competences, and (5) management support during the product development and introduction processes. Also important but less significant were the (6) competence of the marketing and manufacturing organizations and market factors, such as the (7) competitiveness and the (8) size and rate of growth of the target market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
von Hippel, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 · Cited by 4,650
Klecka, W. (1980) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983938 · Cited by 3,723
Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues
Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978) · Cited by 2,778
Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications
Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,905
The new new product development game
(1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90053-6 · Cited by 1,573
Green, P. E., & Carroll, J. D. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,517
New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers?
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(87)90002-6 · Cited by 1,313
Lachenbruch, P. A. (2004) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess0507 · Cited by 1,310
The PIMS principles: Linking strategy to performance
(1989) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(89)90028-9 · Cited by 1,244
The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure
Cooper, R. G. (1979) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224297904300310 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005 · Cited by 2,761
The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences
Danneels, E. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.275 · Cited by 2,381
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152
A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299706100201 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 867-883
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2062490363
- Cited by
- 837
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867
- The paper
- Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A. (1990). A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.