The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Top Team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Large Corporate Bankruptcies
Abstract
This exploratory study of 57 large bankruptcies and 57 matched survivors examined the top management team (TMT) characteristics associated with major corporate failure. Prior research was used to guide selection of specific team characteristics for study. Not only did the failing firms show significant annual, or cross-sectional, divergence from survivors on several indicators of TMT composition, but also those divergences became more pronounced, even accelerating, over the last five years of the bankrupts' lives. The results thus suggest that deterioration of the top management team is a central element of the downward spiral of large corporate failures. Based upon a limited test of causality, the authors propose that a two-way process is at work: (1) team deficiencies bring about or aggravate corporate deterioration, either through strategic errors or stakeholder uneasiness with the flawed team; and (2) corporate deterioration brings about team deterioration, through a combination of voluntary departures, scapegoating, and limited resources for attracting new executive talent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
Cited by
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation
Finkelstein, S. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256485 · Cited by 2,389
MAKING USE OF DIFFERENCE: DIVERSITY, DEBATE, AND DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256987 · Cited by 1,235
Convergence Versus Strategic Reorientation: The Antecedents of Fast-paced Organizational Change
Gordon, S. S., Stewart, W. H., Sweo, R., & Luker, W. A. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600508 · Cited by 189
Financial Distress and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Configuration
Brédart, X. (2014) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v7n3p72 · Cited by 72
Financial Distress and Corporate Governance around Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy
Brédart, X. (2014) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v7n5p1 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hambrick, D. C., & D'Aveni, R. A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1445-1466
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2094652171
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.