CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,235Team Dynamics and PerformanceGender Diversity and InequalityCorporate Finance and Governance

MAKING USE OF DIFFERENCE: DIVERSITY, DEBATE, AND DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.

Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., Smith, K. A.·1999·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/256987
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined how top management team diversity variables and debate interacted to influence two measures of company financial performance. Further, it assessed the degree to which decision c...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256987

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cognitive processes associated with team reflection encourage team members to challenge each other on task-related issues, contributing in turn to constructive interactive practices.

    “The cognitive processes associated with team reflection encourage team members to challenge each other on task-related issues, contributing in turn to constructive interactive practices (Simons et al. 1999;Somech 2006;Tjosvold 1990).”

    From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Simons et al. 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
ORCID
Smith, K. A.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
662-673
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/256987
OpenAlex
W2030214259
Cited by
1,235
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 81
FWCI
21.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
top management team diversity, debate, financial performance, team diversity, decision-making, interaction effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review