The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival-Enhancing Learning in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1980
Abstract
In this study, we examine how experience at the level of the organization, the population, and the related group affects the failure of Manhattan hotels. We find organizational experience has a U-shaped effect on failure; that organizations enjoy reduced failure as a function of population experience before their founding, but not after; and that related organizations provide experience that lowers failure, but it matters whether their experience is local or non-local, and if it was acquired before or after the relationship was established. These results indicate both the difficulty of applying different types of experience to reduce the risk of organizational failure, and the relevance of experience for the evolution of organizational populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/601447 · Cited by 2,038
Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change
Levinthal, D. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.140 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Self-citationSocial Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556658 · Cited by 3,592
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact
Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0280 · Cited by 606
Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances
Sampson, R. C. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.483 · Cited by 443
Pre-Entry Knowledge, Learning, and the Survival of New Firms
Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0387 · Cited by 369
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/1429 · Cited by 246
“…(Haas & Hansen, 2007; Lesser & Storck, 2001), to promote competitive advantage (Argote & Ingram, 2000), to enhance organisational learning (Argote, 1999), to increase innovation (Powell, Koput, & Smith-Doerr, 1996), and to support organisational survival and sustainability (Baum & Ingram, 1998).”
BackgroundPractice makes perfect: entrepreneurial-experience curves and venture performance
Toft-Kehler, R., Wennberg, K., & Kim, P. H. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.001 · Cited by 216
These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining
Madsen, P. M. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0396 · Cited by 175
Zhao, Z., Anand, J., & Mitchell, W. (2005) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00491.x · Cited by 152
Confident or Competent? How to Avoid Superstitious Learning in Alliance Portfolios
Heimeriks, K. H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.10.004 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Baum, J. A. C., & Ingram, P.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 996-1016
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2121222617
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
