Cited by 70Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationInternational Business and FDI

Confident or Competent? How to Avoid Superstitious Learning in Alliance Portfolios

Heimeriks, Koen H.·2010·Long Range Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.10.004

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heimeriks, K. H.
Corresponding author
Heimeriks, Koen H.
Venue
Long Range Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
57-84
ISSN
0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997368400
Cited by
70
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Long Range Planning (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
strategic alliances, alliance portfolio management, overconfidence, knowledge transfer, alliance capability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review