The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality and Competition
Abstract
In recent years, the practitioner literature in operations management has seen a dramatic surge in articles on quality management. It reflects the increased emphasis on quality by U.S. firms, which has been attributed largely to increased competition faced by them. The question of how quality is influenced by competitive intensity, however, has not received much attention, either in the practitioner or the academic research literatures. The notion of competitive intensity itself has not been defined precisely. In this paper, we develop formal models of oligopolistic competition to investigate whether equilibrium levels of quality increase as competition intensifies. We consider three different competitive settings: (i) asymmetric duopolistic competition where the dominant firm's intrinsic demand potential decreases; (ii) a symmetric duopoly where the firms are precluded from cooperating in setting quality levels; and (iii) symmetric oligopolistic competition where the number of firms increases. We find that the relation between equilibrium quality and competitive intensity depends on what is understood by increased competition and, in addition, the relation is contingent on the values of parameters describing the cost and demand structure for the industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Competitive Quality Choice and Remanufacturing
Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu‐Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12040 · Cited by 438
Towards the ‘perfect’ customer experience
Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2007) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550120 · Cited by 386
A Contingent View of Quality Management‐The Impact of International Competition on Quality
Das, A., Handfield, R. B., Calantone, R. J., & Ghosh, S. (2000) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00938.x · Cited by 331
Perspectives on consumer decision making: an integrated approach
Hansen, T. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.33 · Cited by 218
Dynamic model for a defective production system with Poka-Yoke
Tsou, J.-C., & Chen, J.-M. (2005) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601877 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Banker, R. D., Khosla, I., & Sinha, K. K.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1179-1192
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2103449039
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality and Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1179
- The paper
- Banker, R. D., Khosla, I., & Sinha, K. K. (1998). Quality and Competition. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.