The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk
Abstract
In this study, respondents from the P.R.C., U.S.A., Germany, and Poland were found to differ in risk preference, as measured by buying prices for risky financial options. Chinese respondents were significantly less risk-averse in their pricing than Americans when risk preference was assessed in the traditional expected-utility framework. However, these apparent differences in risk preference were associated primarily with cultural differences in the perception of the risk of the financial options rather than with cultural differences in attitude towards perceived risk. In all cultures, an equal proportion (the majority) of respondents was willing to pay more for options perceived as less risky, i.e., were perceived-risk averse. These results are most naturally explained within a risk-return conceptualization of risky choice. They have practical implications for cross-cultural negotiation and commerce by suggesting the locus of cultural differences in risky choice that may allow for the creation of joint gains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1287/mnsc.41.1.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00888.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01539781 · DOI
- Brislin R., Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series, 8, 137
- Brockhaus R. H., 1982, The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship
- 10.1016/0883-9026(88)90020-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.28.8.875 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/000276427301700206 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofstede G., 1980, Culture's Consequences
- 10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1691 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1691
- 10.1177/0022022191221004 · DOI · Paper page
- Levy H., 1979, Amer. Econom. Rev., 69, 308
- Markowitz H. M., 1959, Portfolio Selection
- Mellers B. A., 1997, Choice, Decision and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce, 59
- Pruitt D. G., 1981, Negotiation Behavior
- 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90033-J · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0043608 · DOI · Paper page
- Slovic P., 1997, Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management, 277
- Slovic P., 1991, Canadian J. Public Health, 82, S15
- Tylor E. B., 1871, Primitive Culture
- Triandis H. C., 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 41
- Weber E. U., 1997, Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce, 45
- 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90030-B · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/obhd.1998.2788 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 · Cited by 5,955
Self-citationA domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors
Weber, E. U., Blais, A., & Betz, N. E. (2002) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.414 · Cited by 2,936
Self-citationLee, M.-C. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006 · Cited by 2,037
Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x · Cited by 1,882
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations
Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000334 · Cited by 1,286
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1205-1217
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3124682773
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
- The paper
- Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.