The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation
Abstract
The evolution of technology has been a central issue in the strategy and organizations literature. However, the focus of much of this work has been on what is essentially the “supply side” of technical change—the evolution of firm capabilities. We present a demand-based view of technology evolution that is focused on the interaction between technology development and the demand environment in which the technology is ultimately evaluated. We develop a formal computer simulation model that explicitly considers the influence of heterogeneity in market demand—the presence of consumers with different needs and requirements—on firms' innovation choices. The model is used to examine the dynamics of product and process innovation (Utterback and Abernathy 1975). The analysis reveals that demand heterogeneity offers an alternative to supply-side explanations of the technology life cycle. Further, by considering the implications of decreasing marginal utility from performance improvements, the model highlights the role of “technologically satisfied” consumers in shaping innovation incentives, and suggests a rationale for a new stage in the technology life cycle characterized by increasing performance at a stable price. The stage has not yet been treated formally in the literature, but is widely observed, most prominently in digital and information-based technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Cited by
Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003 · Cited by 2,690
Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351453 · Cited by 1,157
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 · Cited by 1,077
When are technologies disruptive? a demand‐based view of the emergence of competition
Adner, R. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.246 · Cited by 832
Self-citationMurmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Adner, R., & Levinthal, D.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 611-628
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2096943571
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.47.5.611.10482
- The paper
- Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.5.611.10482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.