Cited by 654Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingDigital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation and Knowledge Management

Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change

Open access
Murmann, Johann Peter, Frenken, Koen·2006·Research Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Murmann, Johann Peter
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
925-952
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122226761
Cited by
654
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 46
FWCI
34.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
dominant design, technological innovation, industrial transformation, technological cycles, working principle, pleiotropy, terminology standardization, levels of analysis, technological dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review