The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition
Abstract
Interruptions have commonly been viewed as negative and as something for managers to control or limit. In this paper, I explore the relationship between interruptions and acquisition of routines—a form of knowledge—by teams. Recent research suggests that interruptions may play an important role in changing organizational routines, and as such may influence knowledge transfer activities. Results suggest that interruptions influence knowledge transfer effort, and both knowledge transfer effort and interruptions are positively related to the acquisition of new work routines. I conclude with implications for research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,619
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 2×
“Presently, the knowledge management literature has focused much attention on characteristics of the knowledge (e.g., Grant 1996, Kogut and Zander 1992, Szulanski 1996) with comparatively little attention on timing.”
BackgroundPsychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Cited by
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556658 · Cited by 3,592
Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x · Cited by 1,335
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0197 · Cited by 744
Entrepreneurial Team Formation: An Exploration of New Member Addition
Forbes, D. P., Borchert, P. S., Zellmer–Bruhn, M. E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2006) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00119.x · Cited by 316
Self-citationJungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., & Osterman, U. (2018) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12110 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-528
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2015934400
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423
- The paper
- Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. (2003). Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
