The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work
Abstract
This paper discusses the problems and processes involved in conducting longitudinal ethnographic research. The author's field study of technological change in radiology provides the context for the discussion. Specific attention is paid to how researchers can design a qualitative study and then collect data in a systematic and explicit manner. Consequently, the paper seeks to dispel the notion that participant observation and quantitative data analysis are inimical. Finally, the social and human problems of gaining entry into a research site, constructing a research role, and managing relationships with informants are illustrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Cited by
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action
Pentland, B. T., & Rueter, H. H. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393300 · Cited by 936
The interplay between theory and method
Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586080 · Cited by 860
Counting in Qualitative Research: Why to Conduct it, When to Avoid it, and When to Closet it
Hannah, D. R., & Lautsch, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492610375988 · Cited by 282
Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster
Perez-Aleman, P. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0514 · Cited by 120
Karasti, H. (2001) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1011239126617 · Cited by 48
Spektor, F., Fox, S. E., Awumey, E., Begleiter, B., Kulkarni, C., Stringam, B., Riordan, C. A., Rho, H. J., Akridge, H., & Forlizzi, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579466 · Cited by 29
Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companies
Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200006)21:6<689::aid-smj115>3.0.co;2-y
Metadata
- Authors
- Barley, S. R.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 220-247
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2019568653
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
